My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-08-11 Clsd and Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-08-11 Clsd and Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2008 4:45:18 PM
Creation date
8/7/2008 3:24:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7C <br />for modification of both Marine Parkway and Twin Dolphin Drive as proposed, and lack Page 3 <br />of majority support for modification of Redwood Shores Parkway. At the conclusion of <br />the meeting attendees were asked to indicate, by a show of hands, if they were in favor <br />or not in favor of reconfiguring each of the three roadways. See Table 3 for record of <br />responses. <br /> <br />TABLE 3 <br /> <br /> In Favor Not In Favor Abstained <br />Marine ParkwaY 12 2 1 <br />Twin Dolphin Drive 13 1 1 <br />Redwood Shores Parkway 10 5 1 <br /> <br />Please note that responses from meeting attendees may have been received and <br />recorded as well on Tables 1 and 2 prior to the meeting. <br /> <br />Responses, although limited in number, were disparate. Several community members <br />expressed disapproval of bike lanes entirely. Some community members were <br />dissatisfied that more streets were not modified to include bike lanes. <br /> <br />The proposed roadway modifications have been favorably reviewed by the City's <br />Bicycle & Pedestrian Working Group. <br /> <br />Staff recommends the currently proposed configuration as a workable compromise that <br />reasonably addresses various community concerns. <br /> <br />Four (4) bids were received for the Redwood Shores Slurry Seal Project on July 30,2008, <br />and are summarized below. <br /> <br /> Bidder Bid Amount <br />Graham Contractors. Inc., San Jose $775.119.30 <br />American ASDhalt ReDair and Resurfacing Co., Inc., Havward $779,407.51 <br />Vallev Slurry Seal Co., West Sacramento $857.497.80 <br />Intermountain Slurrv Seal, Inc., Watsonville $1,043,236.20 <br />f=n.alneersEstlmate .. '. . , '. . .' .'. :.' .... .... '.'. . "$849,480.00 :'. <br />Recommended Bidder: Graham Contractors, Inc., of San Jose <br />Substantiation: Graham Contractors, Inc.. is the lowest responsive and <br /> responsible bidder. <br /> <br />The bid of $775,119.30 from Graham Contractors, Inc. of San Jose is 9% lower than <br />the engineer's estimate of $849,480.00 for the cost of construction. Staff believes that <br />Graham Contractors, Inc. bid of $775,119.30 is reasonable and responsive, and <br />recommends awarding the contract to Graham Contractors, Inc. of San Jose. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Council may choose not to award the contract for the Redwood Shores Slurry Seal <br />Project, and direct staff to redesign and/or rebid the project. <br /> <br />Council may choose to award the contract but not to approve the proposed re-striping to <br />reconfigure some or all of the proposed roadways. The roadways would then be re- <br />striped to their existing configuration subsequent to the resurfacing work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.