AgdaPkt 2008-09-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

78 Page 16 . Information gathered from reference checks, litigation history research, and other publicly available sources. The Evaluation Team followed the prescribed process to evaluate the four proposals submitted in response to the RFP. Each Evaluation Team member reviewed and scored the proposals based on a maximum score for each evaluation criteria as set forth in Section 6.1 of the RFP and also included below as Table 1 - Evaluation Criteria and Maximum Evaluation Score. Responsiveness to the RFP Pass/Fail n/a 2 Company's Qualifications and Experience 150 25% 3 Proposal for collection services (Includes both 150 25% Core and Optional Services) 4 Cost Proposal 200 33.3% 5 Environmental Enhancements and Other 50 8.3% Considerations 6 Number and Materiality of Exceptions 50 8.3% nla = not applicable The Evaluation Team members numerically scored the proposing companies in accordance with the evaluation criteria prescribed in Section 6.2 of the RFP. The scores assigned to each of the proposals' reflect the extent to which the company fulfilled the requirements of the evaluation criteria and the extent to which each criterion was fulfilled relative to other proposals. The ratings from the evaluators were compiled and discussed during several Evaluation Team meetings to determine a preliminary ranking of the proposals based solely on the evaluation criteria. The relative rankings were adjusted as new information was analyzed throughout the evaluation process. The Evaluation Team's process 'and progress with analyzing and scoring the proposals was discussed with the Selection Committee at four separate meetings held on March 24, 2008, May 13, 2008, June 11, 2008 and June 25, 2008. The Selection Committee unanimously approved the Evaluation Team's recommendation to select Norcal. 3.2 Evaluation Criteria The proposals were numerically scored and ranked using the criteria and weighting described in section 6.2 of the RFP. The evaluation criteria, maximum score and scoring results are presented in Table 2 - Proposer Evaluation Score. In addition, Appendix A - Evaluation Criteria and Sub-categories provides a list of the sub criteria specified in Section 6.2 of the RFP and used to evaluate and score the four proposals received in response to the RFP. SBWMA Collection Services RFP Selection Committee Report: Evaluation and Scoring of Proposals Page 5 of 31 August 21, 2008