My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-09-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2008 1:08:15 PM
Creation date
9/4/2008 3:01:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Closed
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />78 <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />3. PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS <br /> <br />3.1 Evaluation and Selection Process <br /> <br />Section 6 of the Collection Services RFP prescribed a thorough process to evaluate the <br />proposals received. The evaluation process set forth in the RFP required using an Evaluation <br />Team and Selection Committee comprised of SBWMA staff, member agency staff, industry <br />experts and/or consultants to analyze and score the proposals in order to formulate a <br />recommendation for the SBWMA Board. <br /> <br />The Evaluation Team consisted of: Kevin McCarthy, SBWMA Executive Director; Cliff Feldman, <br />SBWMA Recycling Programs Manager; Marshall Moran, SBWMA Finance Manager; Tim <br />Flanagan, Monterey Regional Waste Management District Assistant General Manager; and R3 <br />Consulting staff Richard Tagore-Erwin and Ric Hutchinson. The Selection Committee consisted <br />of: Larry Patterson, City of San Mateo (Committee Chair); Jim Hardy, City of Foster City; Peggy <br />Jensen, County of San Mateo; Jesus Nava, City of Burlingame; Brian Panty, City of Redwood <br />City; and, Kent Steffens, City of Menlo Park. <br /> <br />The Evaluation Team and Selection Committee conducted an analysis and evaluation of the <br />four RFP responses received and based scoring and ranking on the following information and <br />sources: <br />· Proposals submitted by each company on March 11,2008. <br /> <br />. Responses to correspondence issued by the SBWMA on March 14, 2008 and due back <br />by March 21, 2008 requesting general clarifications and revisions to the cost proposal <br />forms submitted. <br /> <br />. Responses to correspondence issued by the SBWMA on March 27, 2008 and due back <br />by April 1, 2008 requesting specific clarifications and revisions to the cost proposal forms <br />submitted. <br /> <br />. Responses to correspondence issued by the SBWMA on April 9, 2008 and due back by <br />April 15, 2008 requesting clarifications and information on the technical proposal and <br />cost proposal forms submitted. <br /> <br />. Responses to correspondence issued by the SBWMA on April 25, 2008 and due back by <br />May 12, 2008 requesting clarifications and information pertaining to the technical <br />interview conducted and the cost proposal forms (Le., each proposer was provided the <br />opportunity to make any changes to the cost proposals submitted). <br /> <br />. Responses to correspondence issued by the SBWMA on June 12, 2008 and due back <br />by June 19, 2008 requesting clarifications and information pertaining to the companies <br />litigation history. <br /> <br />. One-hour oral interviews held at the SB WMA offices on April 21-22, 2008. <br /> <br />. Site visits conducted as follows: <br /> <br />May 19, 2008 - Norcal (San Bruno Disposal, San Bruno, CA) <br /> <br />May 21,2008 - Republic (Richmond Sanitary Service, Richmond, CA) <br /> <br />May 21,2008 - BEST (Garden City Sanitation, San Jose, CA) <br /> <br />- June 5, 2008 - Allied (Allied Waste Services, Phoenix, AZ) <br /> <br />. Other information submitted by proposer~ in response to requests by the Evaluation <br />Team. <br /> <br />SBWMA Collection Services RFP <br />Selection Committee Report: <br />Evaluation and Scoring of Proposals <br /> <br />Page 4 of 31 <br />August 21, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.