My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-09-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2008 1:08:15 PM
Creation date
9/4/2008 3:01:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Closed
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />78 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />2. RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The Collection Services RFP Selection Committee is recommending selection of Norcal Waste <br />Systems of San Mateo County (Norcal) as the Collection Services contractor for both the <br />North and South Districts. <br /> <br />The SBWMA received four (4) responsive proposals from companies capable and qualified to <br />provide the scope of services specified in the Collection Services request for proposals (RFP) <br />issued on Novem ber 1, 2007. The proposers are: <br /> <br />. Allied Waste Services of San Mateo County (Allied) <br /> <br />. Bayside Environmental Services & Transfer (BEST) <br /> <br />. Norcal Waste Systems of San Mateo County (Norcal) <br /> <br />. Republic Services of California II, LLC (Republic) <br /> <br />Based on review of the proposals submitted, reference checks, technical interviews, site visits, <br />and follow-up questions and answers, the Selection Committee selected Norcal Waste <br />Systems of San Mateo County as the recommended Collection Services contractor for both <br />the North and South Districts. The Selection Committee believes that Norcal is the best choice <br />and provides the best value in comparison to the other proposers for these primary reasons: <br /> <br />. The entirety of Norcal's responses (Le., original proposal, written answers to technical <br />and cost specific questions, and technical interview performance) were the most <br />thorough and complete. <br /> <br />. Norcal offers a combination of experience, technical ability, commitment to diversion <br />and high service delivery, and pricing that sets it apart from the other three proposers. <br /> <br />. Norcal was awarded the most points for its cost proposal due to the strength of its cost <br />proposal in both competitiveness and reasonableness. While the costs proposed were <br />marginally higher than the lowest cost proposal, the supporting explanation and rationale <br />provided for these costs was the most thorough, complete and reasonable of all four <br />proposals. <br /> <br />. The scope of services proposed by Norcal provides the highest comfort level of the four <br />proposers regarding the company's ability to ensure a smooth transition, outstanding-' <br />service delivery, accurate reporting, and consistently high diversion rates. <br /> <br />SBWMA Collection Services RFP <br />Selection Committee Report: <br />Evaluation and Scoring of Proposals <br /> <br />Page 3 of 31 <br />August 21. 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.