Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council cited continued interest in the community in recycled water efforts and the City's <br />need to increase the infrastructure in this area. <br /> <br />MIS HartnetUlra to accept the new language in 6.3b as proposed by staff. Motion carried <br />by unanimous roll call vote. <br /> <br />AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA~AAAA~AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.*A**.****AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*AA.~AAAAA <br /> <br />7. STUDY SESSION <br /> <br />A. Fiscal year 2008/2009 Budget Study Session NO.2 <br /> <br />1. Introduction: <br /> <br />City Manager, Peter Ingram, (presentation on file) went through the Redevelopment <br />Agency, Capital Improvement, the Water Enterprise Fund and the Sewer Enterprise Funds. <br />He also asked Council to urge some Policy Goal language, which they had discussed at a <br />prior meeting. <br /> <br />The Mayor spoke to the policy goals Council hoped to reach and the tentative strategies as <br />listed in the packet. Council felt this was a good beginning and in line with past efforts and <br />activities but wished for further language on not using reserves, in the event that there <br />would be an emergency where these reserves would be needed. Council discussed and <br />the Mayor stated the consensus was in going with the five-year goal plan for budget <br />balance and the need for some language as to extenuating circumstances that might result <br />in spending reserves. She spoke to the majority, but not all Council members, wishing that <br />the software downloading tax wording being left much the same as it is. Mr. Ingram stated <br />Council's input was enough to come back with more concise policy goals. <br /> <br />2. Redevelopment Agency Budget for Fiscal Years 2008/09 and 2009/10 - Citv <br />Council/Redeve/olJment Aaencv Board <br /> <br />Redevelopment Manager, Susan Moeller, presented the Redevelopment Agency budget <br />proposal (presentation on file). Ms. Moeller covered the General Fund as well as their <br />Housing Fund, their accomplishments, and some of the changes in the operating budget. <br />Ms. Moeller spoke to the success of downtown activities and cultural events and other <br />efforts to ramp up downtown interest and revenue, including map and brochures for <br />downtown that would be ready in two weeks. <br /> <br />Council members suggested stressing free parking with respect to encouraging visitors to <br />the downtown area. Council asked if aggressive community building programs would be <br />covered by the agency's future budget plan, and were told that this was dependent on <br />revenues coming in, with redevelopment funds being vulnerable to state actions. If <br />revenues are consistent or grow, the funding will be there for additional programming <br />support for downtown. It was stressed that once the downtown area has less empty space, <br />that a restructuring of these funds may include the private sector taking more of a <br />responsibility. Banners and sign limitations were discussed. <br /> <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />JUNE 23, 2008 <br />PAGE 7 <br />