My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-11-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-11-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2009 11:42:58 AM
Creation date
11/20/2008 2:27:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/24/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that all the residents that signed the petitions were aware of the unintended consequences. <br />She would like more discussion and less confrontation in this process. <br /> <br />Mr. Yamamoto reiterated that the two matters 7 .1.A and 7.1. B are being addressed at the <br />same time. He explained that one item on the agenda required Council action and the other <br />did not. <br /> <br />Robin Smith stated that the 1,200 members of the local Audubon Chapter are in favor <br />of the signature verification and want the initiative on the November ballot. <br /> <br />Stephen Knight, Save the Bay and the Open Space Vote Initiative, urged Council to <br />place the initiative on the November ballot, in that signatures were valid and Council <br />should not stand in the way of due process and democracy. <br /> <br />Mayor Foust clarified that she was holding comments off until Council discussion, but <br />she did speak to the prior comments which insulted Council and Community. She read <br />from the staff report on the review of the petition signatures by the San Mateo County <br />Elections Office and the tight schedule to bring the matter forward to Council. <br /> <br />Mark Fassett spoke on the initiative in that seven residents would be specifically <br />affected by it. He stated his home, and six of his neighbors, are listed as park property <br />in the plan, and asked if they could be designated and zoned as residential to clear <br />things up. He spoke against the initiative and its unintended consequences. <br /> <br />Andy Frisch stressed this issue was about the human impact of the initiative, and <br />issues where the community is unable to work together. He reiterated the <br />inappropriateness of the disrespect being shown to Council and community members. <br />He stressed the importance of healthy debate and agreeing to disagree but also <br />trusting the City government. <br /> <br />Melissa Hippard gave prepared remarks supported by the Sierra Club and voiced its <br />support for the initiative and its open space protective qualities. She opined that the <br />measure provides the voters of Redwood City full power and authority over future <br />development projects. She explained the various species that live in the Cargill site and <br />how this site is critical in restoring bay health. She said that the Sierra Club is proud to be <br />a partner with Redwood City on the Cool City Campaigns. <br /> <br />Nancy Keegan spoke on the seven homes that may be erroneously designated as park <br />versus residential if this measure moves forward. She urged a redefinition of these homes if <br />this is indeed the case because of possible unintended consequences. <br /> <br />Dave Karow stated that compelling alternatives to the initiative should be looked at in an <br />effort to create something workable for both sides of the issue. <br /> <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />JULY 7,2008 <br />PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.