CC Min 2008-07-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Gwenythe Scove asked that the initiative be put on the November ballot. She shared her perspective that this vote initiative will have no effect under current zoning and City plans. She urged continued support of the Open Space Vote in that in her view it will protect parks and tidal planes. Jeff Austin stated that working towards environmental stewardship was important, but that the proposed initiative may be giving lesser consideration to some residential and business community members. He stated the initiative does not make it clear who or what the target is in the initiative, and asked that further discussion warrants more clarity. He would like Save the Bay to know that the City has a commitment toward the environmental future of Redwood City. Peggy Bruggman urged the City to remove its countermeasure since it deals with only one landowner (Cargill), and therefore is legally challengeable. She stated that the countermeasure allows that (I don't understand this?) open space land uses be decided by an unfair 51% vote, whereas the initiative provides the two-thirds requirement and this is not un-democratic. She stated it takes a two-thirds vote to fund activities on these open spaces, and it should take a two-thirds vote to destroy them. James Jonas (with time conceded by Lynn Chou Jonas), stated he is in the Dock Town community, and that they are part of the unintended consequences. He stated the importance of reading and understanding the Open Space measure, in that it implies more than it actually says. He spoke to the actualities of the Open Space measure and how this will affect the community and its unintended consequences. He stated that all parties could do a much better job in addressing this issue together as other communities have done. Cherlene Wright, Chairperson of Citizens to Protect Redwood City, addressed the language on the proposed initiative. She pointed out what she called the larger possible financial impact and how this might be on the ballot language. Marsha Cohen stated she expected public officials to support the majority of what the community desired, and that in gathering petition signatures, there was a two out of three affirmation for the proposed amendment. She spoke to the issue of unintended consequences, the relationship between the City and Cargill, and Council's delay on putting this amendment on the November ballot. She also spoke to a request of public records she submitted to City Clerk Vonderlinden for correspondence regarding Cargill. Carole Wong submitted her comments in writing, and also spoke about her concerns over the unintended consequences. Ms. Wong opined that these do exist for certain property owners whose buildings and/or docks spread out into open waters. She spoke to the zoning concerns for these property owners and the number of properties affected by this initiative. Mayor Foust clarified the number of properties affected on the waterfront which is actually 565 versus 575 she had previously cited, which included multifamily dwellings, single family homes, landscaping and commercial properties. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 28, 2008 MINUTES PAGE 8 MINUTE BOOK NO. 62 Page No.176