Laserfiche WebLink
<br />process. He stated they have reached out to the community, but also were doing so in <br />keeping with Council's process. He shared the vision for the project, discussed the <br />demographics and the employee base in the area, and noted how people in the community <br />could be a part of the Stanford University expansion. <br /> <br />Steve Elliot, with the Stanford University, Office of Plans, Buildings and Real Estate, <br />introduced the project, its background and existing conditions. He commented on the goals <br />they will be considering, potential users, and project objectives. <br /> <br />Dave Lennox, architect for Stanford University, spoke about the design attributes and what <br />is being planned for the Stanford University project in creating a strong sense of place in <br />the downtown area. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Janet Borgens, Friendly Acres Neighborhood representative, wished to go on record stating <br />the neighborhood had concerns, but were looking forward to working with Stanford and <br />staff as the project develops. Ms. Borgens is happy with the progress thus far. She <br />welcomed the Stanford-Redwood City merging, and appreciated their dedication to public <br />process. <br /> <br />Council concurred with initiating the process as outlined in the report, and seconded the <br />comment that this is the beginning of the process, and ultimately if all comes to the Council <br />for approval. Various Council Members commented on specifics related to tax rolls, and <br />creating a community partnership with Stanford. Council asked about the neighbors around <br />the campus and how they would be integrated into the campus plan, and were told that <br />Planners met with Stanford and Genentech Medical Clinics in advance of the public <br />hearings, and they are handling it similar to the way they handled the Sequoia Hospital <br />project, and they will be working with everyone very closely on any changes that are other <br />than design. They intend to keep the zoning the same and design the plan such that it <br />won't affect neighbors. They cited lots of opportunity to discuss issues with owners as part <br />of the continued process. <br /> <br />Council appreciated the efforts made to reach out to the neighborhoods. Council <br />mentioned, again, Spinas Park and hoped for options relating to the possible expansion of <br />the park. Council spoke positively towards Stanford's plan in keeping the green space. <br />Council asked staff to bring back some traffic flow impacts like Pacific Shores and any <br />shared recreational spaces and parking garage. Council would also be interested in having <br />staff look at Palo Alto in terms of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, as well as the San <br />Carlos development agreement, as an informative example, as well as Stanford's <br />agreements with Palo Alto and Santa Clara, with regards to transportation issues. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Howard appreciated the recommendations of going beyond the normal CEQA <br />(California Environmental Quality Act) requirements and doing the analyses regarding <br />potential fiscal and economic impacts, as well as studies on housing and childcare needs <br />and also an analysis of needed open spaces and parks in the neighborhood. She also <br />appreciated the proposed projecUreduced alternative parallel to the General Plan process. <br /> <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />AUGUST 11, 2008 <br />PAGE 9 <br />