Laserfiche WebLink
Public Comment <br /> Greg Richane, representing the San Mateo County Housing Leadership Council, spoke <br /> about the membership of this organization and those who work increase affordable <br /> housing for all levels. He spoke in favor of the new housing element addressing housing <br /> and zoning needs in the community and identified their wish list for the process. <br /> Pat Crawford, representing the Cool Cities Team, acknowledged how much she has <br /> learned through this process. She said she spoke for her team and shared her pride in the <br /> City's Downtown Precise Plan. She reminded everyone of the need to preserve <br /> neighborhoods and augment transportation. She stated that her hope is that green <br /> buildings and green housing become the norm. <br /> Morton Frank, a member of the American Institute of Architects, San Mateo County <br /> Chapter, spoke about the housing element referring not just to numbers but needs and <br /> wants. He expressed his hope that there will be new housing configurations to address <br /> mass building and aggregate housing needs to accommodate various family types. <br /> Members of the Housing and Human Concerns Committee spoke as to why they were <br /> there and what they hoped to accomplish. The committee spoke about establishing a <br /> process and timing for the General Plan and the housing element. Council asked for <br /> information on the current requirements and mechanisms for affordable housing and the <br /> private developments, and asked if there is flexibility in requiring an affordability <br /> component in the Precise Plan. Ms. Ekas addressed this issue stating this might be <br /> possible in the redevelopment area. She stated the Downtown Precise Plan is within the <br /> redevelopment area and spoke to the other areas as well. Council spoke of having <br /> policies for developers to follow without an inclusionary zoning component. Council spoke <br /> about Green Building components and that flexibility and balance be built into the plan. <br /> Council asked for thoughts on the rental and owner ratios. The committee members <br /> spoke to reconfiguring lots and keeping the flexibility in mind when coming up with a full <br /> range of housing options. Council asked staff to discuss what they have seen thus far <br /> with regards to ordinances versus policies. Ms. Ekas spoke to the fact that staff can take <br /> the City's ordinances, give them a look and try to make sense of what works in planning <br /> and include stakeholders. She spoke to the ongoing nature of conversations regarding <br /> these ordinances and policy negotiations. <br /> The Mayor asked how many cities in the county have an inclusionary zoning ordinance, <br /> and staff responded the bay area has the greatest regional concentration of these zoning <br /> ordinances in the state. The Mayor asked that actual numbers be brought back on this. <br /> Four Council Members were not prepared to embrace the concept of inclusionary housing. <br /> Some Council Members sought more flexibility and not necessarily more rules. Mayor <br /> Foust in particular wants policies that produce housing units and not prohibit them. <br /> Council asked for information on the Density Bonus Law and its impacts on the City, and <br /> Ms. Ekas stated it has not been used much in the City, explained the law itself, and <br /> discussed density caps. Council expressed concerns about neighborhoods that have <br /> over-stressed infrastructure. Council asked about getting market housing started, and <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING AND HUMAN CONCERNS COMMITTEE, AND AUGUST 25, 2008 <br /> REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING MINUTES PAGE 7 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 62 <br /> Page No. 212 <br />