My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2021.02.22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
AgdaPkt 2021.02.22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2021 4:51:32 PM
Creation date
2/18/2021 5:12:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/22/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
657
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Street, from where the BIAC lot ends, including the elbow shaped left turn <br />on that last stretch down to the shelter. <br />The land swap of established or dedicated right of way (the vacation) for a <br />strip of Maple allowing Strada more parking can, of course, only extend to <br />two things: (1) land that is in city title; and (/or) (2) the portion of the <br />right of way that was properly dedicated and established under General <br />Law (vs. Charter, and which applies with respect to roadways even for <br />charter cities), and properly executed boundaries for any such authorized <br />right of way condemnations. <br />Again, I am not necessarily (at all) opposed to the concept of land swap <br />for a portion of the properly dedicated right of way, nor to Blomquist going <br />where it is, but I want to lodge the above objections. First, it is not <br />necessary to have done so in a public hearing, esp. due to insufficient <br />notice, but second, because the city can't do anything with the land that it <br />does not have rights to. So that is outside the bounds of objection in a <br />public hearing to something the City otherwise has the clear right to do. <br />I am putting this on the record. The tech issues were unfortunate, and I <br />hope this can all be worked out without anyone having to establish that <br />Docktown always had the upland parking established by a very consistent <br />easement by use and custom for decades. <br />Thanks, <br />Alison <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.