Laserfiche WebLink
<br />concerns that, in his opinion, if the process is bifurcated then there is a higher chance of <br />development in the area. He spoke about the various impacts he believes would occur in <br />the area and he opposes development. <br /> <br />Lou Covey with Sustainable Redwood City, said he supports a two way process. He <br />believes that a vote of the people will be needed on what occurs at Cargill. Mr. Covey <br />supports getting Cargill out of the mix of the current General Plan process. <br /> <br />Greg Greenway, speaking on behalf of Seaport Industrial Association, finds that there is a <br />remarkable amount of common ground. He asked Council to buffer industrial from non- <br />industrial uses; allow opportunities for Port expansion; and, plan for transportation <br />infrastructure. He suggests considering light industrial uses. He is asking for more <br />information on the process should it be bifurcated. <br /> <br />Pat Dixon, opined that the Council's thoughts should be on the Bayfront. She asked that <br />Council flush out all options on the table including housing in that area. <br /> <br />Joey Sciarra Jr. spoke about the marshes and how he helped restoration efforts. <br /> <br />Council discussion: <br />Council voiced an interest in continued public involvement regarding the Bayfront but <br />simultaneously an eagerness to finish the General Plan. A comment was made that the <br />Cargill site and the various measures have diverted the General Plan process. Council <br />discussed seeing the Cargill site as a place of opportunity for a multitude of options. One <br />Council Member stated that ultimately the voters should have a say on this matter. <br />Council discussed hearing from the community and setting a vision instead of being led by <br />the developer's vision. Some Council Members outlined the benefits of taking Cargill out <br />of the General Plan process. Various Council Members pointed out that they do not <br />believe that a proper process can occur with both items side by side. Council stated that <br />time if of the essence. <br /> <br />M/S Aguirre/Hartnett to bifurcate the process and take the Cargill site out of the <br />General Plan process. <br /> <br />Mayor Foust said that a city led process will be in place for the Cargill site and this was <br />always an option. She said that the public is sometimes unclear about the fact that this is <br />not a developer led process. <br /> <br />Motion carries unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> <br />C. Ordinance prohibiting smoking in all Redwood City Parks. <br />(Item moved to another meeting due to the late hour) <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Introduce an ordinance amending Section 25.2.02 (L) of the Redwood City <br />Municipal Code to prohibit smoking in all Redwood City parks. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25.2.02 (L) OF CHAPTER 25, ARTICLE I. PARKS <br />OF THE REDWOOD CITY MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />JANUARY 26, 2009 <br />PAGE 7 <br />