Laserfiche WebLink
<br />88 <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />their support of the HBC guarantee. In addition to the email correspondence, HBC will <br />need to provide SBWMA a fully executed copy of a long-term purchase agreement <br />containing the requisite floor prices. <br />. South Bay has offered an annual revenue guarantee of $7.25M. During negotiation, <br />South Bay proposed to amend their guarantee by inserting an "off-set" mechanism as <br />a means of recapturing revenues from years during which the actual sales revenues <br />fall short of the guaranteed amount. SBWMA rejected the proposed amendment. <br />While South Bay officer, Dan Domonoske, has acknowledged the rejection in an <br />emailed correspondence, SBWMA will need official written confirmation from the <br />company. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commodity Price Manipulation <br />. Hudson Baylor has secured price support from the world's largest recycled commodity <br />buyer. South Bay Recycling partners have direct ow~ership of newsprint and tissue <br />mills. While these features offer tremendous potential benefit to SBWMA, they also <br />present the opportunity for price manipulation. Each proposer has been asked to <br />propose a "fail-safe" mechanism whereby SBWMA can be assured that it always <br />receives the highest prices that are offered in the local market area. <br />Cost Chanaes from oriainallv submitted proposals <br />. During negotiation, HBC contemplated several options to their originally proposed <br />operation. With their tinal proposal, however, though some costs were reallocated, the <br />total additional operating costs amounted to less than $10,000 per year. <br />. At the commencement of negotiations, South Bay was low-bidder by approximately <br />$3.6M annually. During negotiation, South Bay increased their proposed operating <br />costs by approximately $1.75M annually, thereby narrowing the operating cost <br />difference between HBC and SBR to approximately $1.8 M per year. A portion of <br />SBR's increased costs are attributable to the addition staff that were added at the <br />suggestion of the SBWMA. However, the listed staffing changes do not appear to <br />account for the total additional operating cost represented in the company's current <br />proposal. SBWMA has requested that SBR fully account for the added operating <br />costs. <br />Union Issues <br />. Hudson Baylor has executed a Memorandum of Understanding as prepared by <br />Teamsters Local 350. <br />. South Bay acknowledges the current Collective Bargaining Agreement and the <br />expectation that the current contractor, Allied Waste Industries, will enter into a new <br />Agreement with the Teamsters in 2009. South Bay commits to honoring the Collective <br />Bargaining Ag~eement that is in place upon commencement of the new operating <br />contract, but is reluctant to make contractual commitments prior to the award of the <br />contract. <br />. Both companies have been asked to provide updates regarding interaction with the <br />Teamsters. <br /> <br />SBWMA: Facility Operations Selection Committee <br /> <br />1/15/2009 <br />