AgdaPkt 2009-04-13 clsd and jnt - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

88 Page 23 As shown in Table 6-1 of the RFP document and below in Table 1, a maximum evaluation score was assigned to each evaluation criteria with aUotal possible score of 500 points. Table 1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND MAXIMUM EVALUATION SCORE Maximum Item . Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Score 1 Responsiveness to RFP Pass/Fail 2 Company's Qualifications & Experience 100 3 Cost Proposal 100 4 SRDC Operations Proposal 100 5 MRF Installation and Startup Proposal (MRF Equipment Design, Installation & Start-up Pian) 75 6 Materials Marketing Plan 75 7 Environmental Enhancements & Other 25 Considerations 8 Number & Materiality of Exceptions 25 T()taJ Maximum Score 500 The ratings from the evaluators were compiled and discussed during several evaluation committee meetings to determine a preliminary ranking of the proposals based solely on the evaluation criteria. The relative rankings were adjusted as new information was analyzed throughout the evaluation process. The Evaluation Committee's work was discussed with the Selection Committee at meetings held on May 13th, June 11th, and June 25th. On June 25th, the Selection Committee unanimously approved the evaluation committee's recommendation to shortlist SBR and HBC. The Evaluation Procedures in the RFP (described in Section 6.1) envisioned a short-list being developed prior to technical interviews. After the initial review of proposals, the Evaluation Committee made the determination that all of the proposers met the minimum requirements. Thus, all seven firms participated in the technical interview and presentation process. PROPOSER SCORING ReSULTS Proposers' evaluation scores are presented in Table 2, Proposer Evaluation Score, which shows scores for each proposer on each of the criteria. Circled scores represent the best scores. SBWMA - EC Report Page 5 1/15/2009