Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />ATTAcHME~l1ge 9 <br /> <br />mixed uses on Woodside Road (approximately 200 yards away) to the east, <br />condominiums to the southeast, single-family residences and duplexes to the north <br />(rear) on Union.Avenue as well as on Kentfield Avenue. <br /> <br />The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) recommended approval of the proposed <br />project design on March 24, 2009, after three previous revisions. The ARCts comments <br />and conditions were related to the exterior treatment of the buildings and the site plan <br />and have been incorporated into the final plans. <br /> <br />This development proposal requires an Environmental Assessment, Tentative Map, <br />and Planned Development Permit to be approved by the City. <br /> <br />The Environmental Assessment includes the prepa~~~~~n of an Initial Study and <br />Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for this project whic9~{:'Cles~~iBes the proposed project, <br />presents the findings, and states the reasons for ,tOt3 conctu~i.gn that there will be no <br />significant effect on the environment. A come1rted Initial Studr is attached to the <br />Negative Declaration to support the determin~tionof!,Jl0 significant~~ct. <br /> <br />A Planned Development Permit (PO) ij~(~J~R require.p to allow the con$~ryetion of 24 <br />units with the proposed site configuration.a~~euse t~~"i,project site is greater than one <br />acre, the Planning Commission has the autn~~i!X::,<(to review and take action on the <br />Planned Development Permit. Article 46 Of"}E~re Zoning Ordinance, Planned <br />Development Permits, allows~"~9L a planned devet~r;),fl1ent within the existing zoning <br />district "to encourage flexibility d~'~~~~j~n and develoPn1~flJ ofl~nd in such a manner as <br />to promote its most appropriate lJ~e'~;~~.j!~;~ubmitting to:t)~;~.t1~r scrutiny. Therefore, the <br />role of the Planning CommiSslqp is.tqf0~~~r pUblic,festimony on the Planned <br />Development Permit and render ~.deci~.ionb~~~9:91}l'+' findings relevant to Planned <br />Developments. . . <br /> <br />;"',: <br /> <br />A Tentativ~;,'p (TM)iS;":-~equired in order to merge the two existing parcels which will <br />then be stdB ................,...~.~ into ~~. lots with a cOflP.mon space parcel. The Tentative Map must <br />conform to theP:f@~ned~.~~~IQpment Perrt1it approval. <br /> <br />.^;...p..;.... :.,:::.,:: <br /> <br />~~;.:;$t~ij~.:;.n;;,~rticleg;'~[j;:~ecti~.ili4!621 of the Zoning Ordinance, the purpose of the <br />,"Planned De,;,,:,..,~~R1ent'R~~it is as listed below. The Planning Commission, based on <br />,_..~he application'<~~~t,..relatea;,,~,~.~~Jtials submitted and the written and/or verbal testimony <br />""'"~~geived prior toq~~;guring t~~Public Hearing on this matter, approved the application <br />fO~0,)~:l~nned Develo~~ent Rermit, subject to the conditions of approval listed below. As <br />reqQi~~g by Section1"~6 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission must base <br />their d~~ion reg~~ging the Planned Development Permit request on the standards <br />listed in :tn~/.zoningOrdinance and other factors listed below. <br /> <br />........ . <br /> <br /> <br />Findings - I~jtial Study/Mitigated negative Declaration: <br />That the Planning Commission adopted the IS/MND based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was completed in compliance with <br />CEQA; <br /> <br />2. That the Planning Commission has considered the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration, along with comments received during the public review process, and <br />has determined that, based on the whole record before it, there is no substantial <br />evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and <br /> <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />