My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-06-15 clsd and spc
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-06-15 clsd and spc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2009 11:02:15 AM
Creation date
6/11/2009 1:31:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/15/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8A <br />Page 19 <br /> <br />Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant <br /> <br />The bill amends the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 pertaining to the Energy <br />Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG): <br />1) removes limits on funds received by communities through the EECBG program that can <br />be used to fund revolving loan accounts; <br />2) allows small communities to join with other neighboring small communities in a joint <br />program of sufficient size to be defined as an eligible local government recipient under <br />the EECBG program. <br /> <br />"Red Flags" Rule Delayed Until Aug. 1 <br /> <br />The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on April 30 that it would once again delay <br />enforcement of the "Red Flags. rule requirement until Aug. 1. <br /> <br />The League raised Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction (FACT) Act compliance last August and <br />many cities have experienced pressure to comply with the new "Red Flags" rule, which requires <br />some cities to implement written identity theft prevention programs. The Federal Trade <br />Commission has moved the deadline for compliance from to May 1 to Aug. 1. <br /> <br />The FACT Act added new provisions to the Federal Credit Reporting Act to protect consumers <br />against identity theft. New regulations require financial institutions and creditors to develop and <br />implement written identity theft prevention programs. <br /> <br />The FTC has developed a Web site (htto:/lwww.ftc.Qov/redflaQsrule)to help entities covered by <br />these rules design and implement identity theft prevention programs. <br /> <br />Please contact Natasha Karl, legislative analyst, with questions regarding these new rules at <br />nkarl@caciteis.orQ. <br /> <br />Federal Collective Bargaining Bill May Have Little Impact on California Public <br />Employers <br /> <br />For the third consecutive year, the U.S. House of Representatives has introduced the Public <br />Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act. H.R. 413. Sponsored by Dale E. Kildee (D-MI), this <br />legislation has been hailed by federal Democrats as a necessary measure and President Obama <br />has said he would sign the bill. <br /> <br />H.R. 413 would require local governments to collectively bargain with public safety officers and <br />outlines a number of minimum requirements including: granting safety officers the right to join and <br />form unions; provide for bargaining over hours, wages, and terms and conditions of employment; <br />make available an interest impasse resolution mechanism; and, require enforcement through the <br />courts. <br /> <br />According to Liebert Cassidy Whitmore analysis, California does meet the requirements set out in <br />the bill and it is likely that we would not be subject to it should it become law and California would <br />continue to bargain under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. However, if litigation is pursued <br />regarding this bill the courts may ultimately determine whether California's collective bargaining <br />laws would be exempt. <br /> <br />Giving exclusive authority to the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) to enforce the <br />requirements laid out in H.R. 413 as well as tasking the entity with making the determination as to <br />whether California and other states satisfy the criteria has been a hot issue. Giving such authority <br />to a federal agency has raised a number of concerns among states that currently have <br />collectively bargaining laws in place. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.