Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 20 <br /> <br />CalPERS Evaluates New Health Plan Design Options with Cost-Sharing In Mind <br /> <br />On May 29, members of the Health Benefits Committee of the CalPERS board continued to <br />evaluate new health plan design options in an effort to keep premiums as low as possible. This <br />discussion happened a few weeks after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger released the May budget <br />revise. The Governor, to save $132 million. proposed having the state negotiate and contract <br />directly with health care providers instead of through CaIPERS. <br /> <br />While CalPERS hasn't released any details as to what it's considering, members of the Health <br />Benefits Committee contend that CalPERS' goal is to "balance the members' need for low <br />premiums with an opportunity for each member to have meaningful benefit choices." <br /> <br />Labor groups attending the meeting raised a number of concerns including the issue of adverse <br />selection or the pattem in the health care industry where individuals choose their health care plan <br />options based on their own assumed risk of getting ill. Those who see themselves using their plan <br />more may choose a more substantial plan, whereas individuals that assume they are less likely to <br />become sick may choose a less substantial plan. According to labor. by isolating individuals that <br />are more likely to use their health plan at a higher rate you may inadvertently make the cost of <br />those plans rise. but only on those the individuals that utilize their plan more and this can cause a <br />disparity. <br /> <br />CalPERS is considering a number of plan design options which would decrease monthly <br />premiums through increased cost-sharing in the form of higher co-pays and out-of-pocket <br />maximums. The new plan offering will consider cost-sharing in office visits, hospital inpatient and <br />outpatient services, emergency room services, generic and brandwname prescription drugs, and <br />out-of~pocket maximums. <br /> <br />labor representatives asked the committee to think about this as a cost-shift option from <br />employer to employee not a cost-sharing option. Regardless of whether CalPERS' health care <br />plan designs are going to be seen as a cost-shift or cost-sharing, health care costs continue to <br />rise and public employers are bearing the brunt. Employer groups have argued that with city <br />revenues declining, the Governor's threat to raid city coffers, and the enormous cost of health <br />care-something has to be done. <br /> <br />CalPERS will be scheduling stakeholder meetings to discuss this concept. league staff will <br />continue to keep members informed. <br /> <br />Please contact Natasha Karl, legislative analyst, with any questions at nkarl@cacities.orQ. <br /> <br />Find a Bill, Legislators, Leg Committee, or Ask League Leg Staff <br /> <br />Visit (and bookmark!) the League's LeQislative Resources Web page <br />(www.cacities.orallearesources). You'll find a roster and contact information for the League's <br />legislative staff; the online Bill Search program, background materials on lobbying your <br />legislators, and more. <br /> <br />Upcoming Events <br /> <br />June <br /> <br />The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Capital Fund Recovery <br />Competition Grants. The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development <br />(HUD) will begin accepting applications from publiC housing authorities for $1 billion <br />available from this program. Applications for grants in the Energy Efficiency category are <br />due by July 21. Applications for the other three categories are due by Aug. 18. (For <br /> <br />12 <br />