Laserfiche WebLink
<br />landscaping and open space. One Council Member commented that the pitched roof was <br />attractive. The Council discussed the greenery around the property. <br /> <br />Council asked about the changes that the developer made taking in account the <br />comments from the community. Ms. Ekas said that the following items were revised: five <br />balconies were eliminated, ongoing dialogue on tree selection, one unit was moved <br />towards the street, six parking spaces were interspersed, and an increase in the front <br />setback of the two front units. Council asked for a demo of the solar impacts. Ms. Ekas <br />covered the shadow studies in detail (presentation on file). <br /> <br />Council asked what would happen if the developer was to reduce the height. Staff said <br />this would probably impact density. Parking by permit was also discussed and how this <br />might be implemented. One Council Member would like staff to look at a formula or a <br />process determining how and when the neighborhood should be brought in so that <br />planned development permits have a smoother outreach process. One Council Member <br />commented on the caliber of the City's Planning staff and thanked the Planning <br />Commission for its hard work. Mayor Foust thanked Ms. Ekas for her professional <br />integrity shown through the public apology. One Council Member thanked Mr. Bautista for <br />all his research and dedication to his neighborhood. <br /> <br />Council discussed the new General Plan and how there needs to be clarity and <br />transparency on the rules and regulations. Mayor Foust said that the Council is struggling <br />tonight with balancing the needs and the demands of the community. She stated that <br />housing is needed in this community. She opined that ultimately negotiations do not occur <br />without compromise. In her opinion it is important to find the common ground and avoid <br />absolutes. <br /> <br />MIS Bain/Aguirre to extend the meeting to 11 :30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously by <br />voice vote. <br /> <br />Assistant City Attorney Aranda referred to the zoning ordinance article 48 and 48.5 <br />quoting the Council's options. He confirmed that Council can retain jurisdiction of the <br />matter, and request additional information and wait for another recommendation. One <br />Council Member commented that the developer could provide some concessions on <br />issues related to height, parking and density. It was suggested that this matter go back to <br />the Planning Commission and come back to the Council via an expedited process. <br /> <br />Council discussed the various options in detail. Council Member Ira said he would prefer <br />having the developer work with the Planning Commission and get a recommendation from <br />them but have the Council maintain jurisdiction. He believes that density could be <br />reduced. One Council Member was ready to uphold the decision of the Planning <br />Commission tonight. Vice Mayor Howard said she would support the suggestion from <br />Council Member Ira if he made it into a motion. <br /> <br />MIS Hartnett/Ira to have the Council retain jurisdiction of the matter, have staff work with <br />the developer on issues relating to height and parking and seek a recommendation from <br />staff. The motion also includes closing the public hearing tonight. One Council Member <br />would like to know the implications of these changes and asked that these be included <br />when the matter comes back. This became part of the motion. <br /> <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />JUNE 1,2009 <br />PAGE 7 <br />