Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 E <br /> Page 7 <br /> Mr.Peter Vorame�santr <br /> Moy 14, Z009 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Fee per Additional Model Run <br /> � To date, Cfty sraff has provided three dif#erent versions o#the 2�09 General Plar�"Project" land <br /> use data, on�y two of which TJKM converted into the mode{format and used In modei runs to <br /> produce feretasts. With those two"Project"model runs, plus two model runs(one each)for the <br /> "Reduced Build Out"and"Sustainable St�-eetcar Neig�borhoods"General Plan alternatives,TJKM <br /> has to date completed four o#the six modei forecast scenario runs ir�cluded in our scope of work. <br /> We expect to perform a model run for the"Cumulative" General Plan scenario soon,which <br /> wouid leave one remaining model run available within the work scope. <br /> If the City requests additional model runs for different land use or roadway network scena�-ios, <br /> TJKM's proposed fee per addit9or�al mode! nans is$S,Q00 each. <br /> Tokal Contract Amendment Budge� <br /> Based on the tasks and associated charges rtemized above, TJKM proposes a total contract <br /> amendment budget of$7b,250 1�an additional $�,�0 for each additiona! model run that City <br /> staff may choose to allow for in this contract amendment <br /> Please let me know if you have any questions or if you wish to dlscuss anything In greater detait. <br /> Regards, <br /> Jia Hao Wu, Ph.D. <br /> Director of Modeling Services <br /> � ������� <br /> Richard K. Haygood, P.E, T.E. <br /> Senior Associate <br /> cr. Chris Kinxef—TJKM <br /> Robert Corning-TJKM <br /> Evi Pagh—TJ KM <br />