Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.1D <br />Page 33 <br /> <br />... City of Redwood City <br /> <br />It is possible that following the seoping meeting (Element 1.5) and review of co~ts <br />.on the NOP, the scope of the EIR may be expanded beyond the environmental <br />parameters anticipated at this time. Each ot'these 11 environmental parameters is <br />discussed in greater detail below. <br /> <br />Aesthetics <br />The project site is currently an undeveloped wooded hillside surrounded by single- <br />family residential develapment. The project would involve developing the site with <br />18 residential units, which would significantly alter theappe,arance of the site. The <br />project would involve the develapment .of single family residences similar to those that <br />exist in the surrounding parcels, and so would be in keeping with nearby development. <br />However, design guidelines may be required to minimize the visual impact .of the <br />devel.opment .on the surrounding residences, and to mitigate aesthetic impacts to a lesser <br />level. <br /> <br />MHA I RMt will analyze the visual impacts .of the propased 'project from up to three key <br />observation points and provide up to three visual simulations of the site with the <br />proposed project. <br /> <br />Air Quality <br />The proposal would involve fuel combustion emissions during both construction and <br />occupancy.. Construction emissions would include fuel combustion from grading and <br />building activities, as well as fugitive dust emissions during earthmoving operations. <br />Emission control me3$UreS may be required to reduce potential air quality impacts to an <br />. insignificant level. Air quality issues surrounding the occupancy of 18 new residences in <br />the area would likely be negligible. <br /> <br />MHA I RMT will provide an air quality impact analysis based on detailed construction <br />plans and schedule of equipment use provided by the applicant (including a detailed <br />grading plan). <br /> <br />Biological Resources <br />Though the applicant's biological site assessment found no special status plant or animal <br />species on the site at the time of the two site'visits, there is the potential for three special <br />status wildlife species and one plant special status species to exist on the site. In <br />additionJ the site is heavily vegetated with oak trees and other trees. Nomad Ecology <br />will peer review the applicant's biological site a~ssment, and will assist MHA f.RMT in <br />identifying steps that can be taken to minimize impacts pn sensitive species and to <br />mitigate the removal of mature trees. <br /> <br />January 11, 2008 <br />AMY <br /> <br />1.1 <br />