Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />ATTACHM~f~e 6 <br /> <br />mixed. uses on Woodside Road (approximately 200 yards away) to the east, <br />condominiums to the southeast, single-family residences and duplexes to the north <br />(rear) on Union Avenue as weB as on Kentfield Avenue. <br /> <br />The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) recommended approval of the proposed <br />project design on March 24, 2009, after three previous revisions. The ARC.s comments <br />and conditions were related to the exterior treatment of the buildings and the site plan <br />and have been incorporated into the final plans. <br /> <br />This development proposal requires an Environmental Assessment, Tentative Map, <br />and Planned Development Permit to be approved by the City <br /> <br /> <br />The Environmental Assessment includes the prepar: <br />Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for this project whic <br />presents the findings, and states the reasons for con <br />significant effect on the environment. A com te '. Initial <br />Negative Declaration to support the determin significa <br /> <br />of an I nitial Study and <br />.. s the proposed project, <br />~ that there will be no <br />is attached to the <br />ct. <br /> <br />r to merge the two existing parcels which will <br />n space parcel. The Tentative Map must <br />approval. <br /> <br />Section of the Zoning Ordinance, the purpose of the <br />it is as listed below. The Planning Commission, based on <br />. als submitted and the written and/or verbal testimony <br />ublic Hearing on this matter, approved the application <br />ent rmit, subject to the conditions of approval listed below. As <br />of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission must base <br />ng the Planned Development Permit request on the standards <br />rdinance and other factors listed below. <br /> <br />I Study/Mitigated negative Declaration: <br />ning Commission adopted the IS/MNO .based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was completed in compliance with <br />CECA; <br /> <br />2. That the Planning Commission has considered the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration, along with comments received during the public review process, and <br />has determined that, based on the whole record before itf there is no substantial <br />evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and <br /> <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />