My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-03 spc, clsd and jnt
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-03 spc, clsd and jnt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:20:14 PM
Creation date
7/30/2009 12:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/3/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1 E <br /> Page 2 <br /> The five (5) bids received at the bid opening on Juty 8, 24Q9, are summarized below: <br /> Bidder Bid Amount <br /> Granite Rock Com an QBA Pavex Cons#ruction Di�ision—San Jose $1,195,158.0� <br /> Red wick Construction Co. — Newark 1,239,409.45 <br /> Jose h J.Albanese, Inc.—Santa Ciara '�,245147.40 <br /> To Grade Construction, [nc.—Foster C' 1,28? 885.00 <br /> lnterstate Gradin & Pavin , Inc. —South San Francisco 1,739,910.20 <br /> . _....... . .. . . .. ... . . ........... .. <br /> En ineer's Estitnate ......... . . � <br /> . .. . ... .. .. ... ... .... _ . $'�,563,00�.�4� .. <br /> Bid Protest <br /> The city received a [etter dated July '15, 2009 from Redgwick Cons#ruction protesting <br /> the bid submEtted by Granite Rock Construc#ion Company dba Pavex. Redgwick <br /> alleged that the apparent low bid submitted by Pa�ex was "unbalanced", which means <br /> that some of the unit price items are substantially undenraiued, whi[e other items are <br /> overvalued. Redgwick specified two line items, aggregate base and hot mix asphalt, <br /> and asser�ed that the imbalance would affect the city's overall cost for the project. <br /> Pavex responded fio the protest in a letter dated July 20, 2009. (n that fetter, Pavex <br /> acknowledged the city's discretion to reject unbalanced bids. Pa�ex attributed the Iow <br /> unit prices to the �act that it is an integrated materiai supply, transpor�ation, and <br /> construction campany. <br /> AL.TERNATIVES <br /> Council may choose to reject the apparent low bid submitted by Pa�ex and award the <br /> contract to Redgwick as the secand iowest bidder. Any legal chalienge by either Pavex <br /> or Redgwick may delay the work of this project, <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> A total of $1,162,000.0� in ARRA and CMAQ grant funds have been awarded <br /> specifically for the streetscape work of this praject. Additional and previously <br /> appropriated funding is available from Capital Projects Fund — E'CR Granc� Boulevard <br /> lmprovements, with a balanoe of $�55,874.40 as of June 30, 2U49, to pro�ide for the <br /> remaining cost of#he contract.. Funds for the work to replace the watermain have been <br /> previously appropria#ed as Water Fund Cap�#a� Projecfs -- Distribution Sys�em <br /> Replacement Program which has a� avaiiable balance of $918,376.29 as of June 30, <br /> 2009. ..�, <br /> �. <br /> -�i�� - <br /> M. Saber Sarwary, P.E. S. Peter Vorametsan , . . <br /> Acting Supe ising CiviE Engineer City Engineer <br /> .., <br /> Chu Chan , P. . Peter Ingram <br /> Building, lnftastructure and City Manager <br /> Transportation Departmertt Director <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> None <br /> RELATE�D�CUMENTS IN CITY CLERK'S C)FF10E <br /> 1. Contract Documents <br /> 2. Bid Documents <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.