My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />San Mateo County <br />City Managers Association <br /> <br />6.1G <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />! . <br /> <br />Response to the San Mateo County Grand Jury Report <br />On The Upward Trajectory of Employee Costs in Cities <br /> <br />The Cities of San Mateo COWlty have received and reviewed the "San Mateo County <br />Grand Jury report on the Upward Trajectory of Employee Costs in the Cities of San <br />Mateo County.>> We appreciate the efforts of the Grand Jury to elevate this very complex <br />issue for cities and one that bas recently been under much public scrutiny. This response <br />is being sent on behalf of a San Mateo County task force that began cooperatively <br />looking at the issue of public employee wages and benefits in the County in June 2008t <br />prior to the release of the Grand Jury report. In this response, which has also been <br />sanctioned by the San Mateo County City Manager's Association and Human Resources <br />Association, we provide the following information: <br /> <br />I) Background information - in addition to what is provided in the grand jury report, this <br />response will provide additional background information related to this issue. <br /> <br />m Common and shared interests - the response will also highlight the stakeholders' <br />. common and shared interests. Stakeholders include the tax -payerst City Cotmcils, City <br />personnel, labor groups, and the grand jury. <br /> <br />III) General responses to the grand jury's recommendation - These responses will be <br />provided from a regional perspective and elaborate on initiatives that have already been <br />developed and/or implemented throughout San Mat~ County. <br /> <br />1) Background Information: <br /> <br />As the grand jury statest two significant pieces of legislation were passed by the State of <br />California in the late 1990s: enhanced retiremen.t formulas for safety groups and binding <br />. arbitration for safety contract negotiations. This resulted in safety unions having <br />tremendous leverage at the bargaining table and they were empowered then to bargain <br />significant wage and benefit enhancements for their members. At this same time, cities <br />were having much difficulty in attracting police and fire candidates in what was a very <br />tight, "dot-com" labor market. As the grand jury recommends, cities did consider the <br />number of applicants for these occupations when negotiating salaries in the 1990's. In <br />.........-.-----.:..- ..--..-that era,..candidates.were-hard to- come..by.-and wages..were-not competitive.with the........ <br />overall Silicon Valley labor market. Many public employees do not participate in social <br />security and do not have the stock option plans and 401(k) plans that were experiencing <br />substantial investment return growth during the dot-com boom. The confluence of these <br />events lead to wage and benefit enhancements that are beyond affordability in today's <br />economy.. <br /> <br />Another factor that contributed to pension enhancements was the proposed costs supplied <br />by the California Public Employee's Retirement System (CalPERS). When initially <br />adopted, pension enhancements were calculated by Cal PERS and reported in actuarial <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.