My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Kentfield Project and he highlighted that "no changes" to physical roadways, to address <br />massing and scale, no changes to preserve more trees were effectuated (presentation on <br />file). He explained that the only change was on the storm water and he added that there <br />were some findings that were very difficult to make. He referred to a letter to Mr. Lanzone <br />and shared excerpts of minutes and a particular letter. He explained why he does not think <br />this is a classic infill project. <br /> <br />Kirk McGowan, the developer, made a brief presentation of the benefits of the project to <br />the community and how it fits into the neighborhood. Alan O'Driscoll said he is a geologist <br />and part of the Project Applicant Team. He showed a picture of the creek (on file) as he <br />read a statement on why additional study is not warranted. J.R. Rodine, project consultant <br />on the Project Applicant Team made a presentation (on file) to Council on the creek, storm <br />water treatment, creek conditions, and creek improvement. <br /> <br />Council asked questions of Mr. Ponti regarding sidewalks. Mr. Ponti explained that for him <br />the scale and the massing of the project are a problem. Council asked questions of Mr. <br />Jany and Ms. Ekas and both provided information on the historic district issue and the <br />zoning for the area. <br /> <br />Council took a break at 9:35 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:55 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Foust opened the public hearing. She also explained that there was some planning <br />prior to the meeting tonight and the time limits agreed upon. Based on the fact that each <br />side was well organized and so the speakers were going to be from the ones outside of <br />the teams (18 unique speaker cards) or to take the additional speakers. Council's <br />pleasure was to take the unique cards and list to the comments. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Mark Casaretto said he lives on Finger Avenue and his concerns include maintaining the <br />character of the neighborhood, creek setbacks, flood damage, and he suggested that the <br />city may be liable for any eventual damages. He urges the Council to uphold the decision <br />of Planning Commission and deny the project. <br /> <br />Nita Spangler has lived in Redwood City since 1947 and asked Council to uphold the <br />decision of the Planning Commission. She believes Wellesley Park is a good candidate <br />for a historic district and be considered for landmark designation. She mentioned some of <br />her accomplishments as these relate to historic designations. <br /> <br />Gabriel De Armelo said he lives across from Finger Avenue and he supports this project <br />because he believes it is good for the neighborhood and he has seen other projects done <br />by the developer that he also likes. <br /> <br />Julie Abraham, a resident of Finger Avenue, thanked both sides of the issue and she <br />thinks the development does not respect the character of the street. She said parking will <br />be an issue and she opined that the size of the houses is offensive and the project layout <br />creates an insular "look and feel" for the area. <br /> <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />AUGUST 3, 2009 <br />PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.