My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
th <br /> ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues which require <br />Comment <br />Element Needed further direction are highlighted.) <br />48. Page BE-74 we should revisit Yes Staff seeks comment clarification. <br />nonconforming uses and consider how <br />to make Woodside Rd better, safer, and <br />more economically viable thoroughfare. <br />49. Page BE-79 (Program BE-13): we No None <br />should emphasize opening up our <br />waterways and connect neighborhoods <br />more. <br />50. We need to be careful not to have No None <br />too much detail to limit GPAs. Create <br />opportunity and don't make too <br />restrictive. <br />51. Page 169: Reorder to discuss No Staff/consultant will reorder to discuss opportunities before challenges. <br />opportunities before the challenges. <br />52. In relation to building heights, in Consider 1. Determine minimum heights and minimum requirements as part of this effort <br />order to ensure the Grand Boulevard options and add those minimums into the General Plan policy. <br />result, we may want to set minimum 2. Add New Policy: Consider establishing minimum intensities along primary <br />heights and minimum requirements. corridors that are intended to be served with fixed-rail transit. <br />The higher densities are necessary to <br />support the amenities (such as the <br />streetcar). <br />53. With regards to the ferry, we should No Add information on infrastructure issues related to potential ferry. <br />also mention infrastructure issues <br />including need for a deeper basin and <br />related coordination needed with the <br />Corps of Engineers. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.