Laserfiche WebLink
th <br /> ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues which require <br />Comment <br />Element Needed further direction are highlighted.) <br />48. Page BE-74 we should revisit Yes Staff seeks comment clarification. <br />nonconforming uses and consider how <br />to make Woodside Rd better, safer, and <br />more economically viable thoroughfare. <br />49. Page BE-79 (Program BE-13): we No None <br />should emphasize opening up our <br />waterways and connect neighborhoods <br />more. <br />50. We need to be careful not to have No None <br />too much detail to limit GPAs. Create <br />opportunity and don't make too <br />restrictive. <br />51. Page 169: Reorder to discuss No Staff/consultant will reorder to discuss opportunities before challenges. <br />opportunities before the challenges. <br />52. In relation to building heights, in Consider 1. Determine minimum heights and minimum requirements as part of this effort <br />order to ensure the Grand Boulevard options and add those minimums into the General Plan policy. <br />result, we may want to set minimum 2. Add New Policy: Consider establishing minimum intensities along primary <br />heights and minimum requirements. corridors that are intended to be served with fixed-rail transit. <br />The higher densities are necessary to <br />support the amenities (such as the <br />streetcar). <br />53. With regards to the ferry, we should No Add information on infrastructure issues related to potential ferry. <br />also mention infrastructure issues <br />including need for a deeper basin and <br />related coordination needed with the <br />Corps of Engineers. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />