Laserfiche WebLink
th <br />ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues <br />Comment Background Information <br />Element Needed which require further direction are highlighted.) <br />54. Best management practices for No Add information on shuttle best practices. <br />shuttles should be explored, marketing <br />(signs) and certainty on schedule are <br />both important. <br />55. Curious in port areas if there is Existing program: No Add program to consult with Port about the most efficient use of port <br />timeline for life of the portside complex. Program BE-99: Port or Redwood City land for port, recycling, and/or industrial related uses. <br />The General Plan includes discussion of Consultation. Consult with the Port, marine-related <br />reserving land for Port related business, businesses, and other stakeholders to promote the <br />including industrial and recycling. geographic location and optimize maritime <br />Perhaps the port should work on infrastructure of the Port in order to attract and/or <br />timeline with staff to phase out office expand marine-related industries <br />uses for industrial uses. <br />56. With regards to Downtown, we No Add a program to consult with County representatives regarding <br />should mention partnering with the building design, land use, and economic development. <br />County as they are a large land owner. <br />Benefits include consistency with design <br />and making sure our businesses work <br />well; as the County is one of our biggest <br />employers. Include them in a positive <br />collaborative way. <br />57. Page 227: City's creek setback No Programs will be revised to ensure that the creek setback ordinance is <br />ordinance is unclear in terms of Finger the appropriate tool for creek maintenance, daylighting, and <br />Ave setback. We should look at the restoration. If additional programs are needed to fully address policy, <br />creek setback ordinance, and why we they will be added. <br />have it. We talk about daylighting, etc. <br />But the way the ordinance is organized, <br />it deals with runoff and flooding rather <br />than riparian corridors. Working with <br />neighbors to restore creeks is a <br />program. We should explore the idea of <br />easements and see what other <br />communities that have done a good job <br />with restoration have done (San Jose <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />