Laserfiche WebLink
th <br />ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues <br />Comment Background Information <br />Element Needed which require further direction are highlighted.) <br />49. Page BE-79 (Program BE-13): we Policy BE-10.6 (Waterfront Neighborhoods): No None <br />should emphasize opening up our Improve pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and <br />waterways and connect neighborhoods automobile linkages between the Bayfront and the <br />more. areas west of U.S. 101. <br />Natural Resources Element Goals and Policies are <br />included to protect and enhance waterways (Goal <br />NR-5 and NR-6 and related policies) <br />North Main Precise Plan plans for a pedestrian bike <br />plan along the creek. <br />50. We need to be careful not to have No None <br />too much detail to limit GPAs. Create <br />opportunity and don't make too <br />restrictive. <br />51. Page 169: Reorder to discuss No Staff/consultant will reorder to discuss opportunities before challenges. <br />opportunities before the challenges. <br />52. In relation to building heights, in Consider 1. Determine mininimum heights and minimum requirements as part <br />order to ensure the Grand Boulevard options of this effort and add those minimums into the General Plan policy. <br />result, we may want to set minimum 2. Add New Policy: Consider establishing minimum intensities along <br />heights and minimum requirements. primary corridors that are intended to be served with fixed-rail <br />The higher densities are necessary to transit. <br />support the amenities (such as the <br />streetcar). <br />53. With regards to the ferry, we should No Add information on infrastructure issues related to potential ferry. <br />also mention infrastructure issues <br />including need for a deeper basin and <br />related coordination needed with the <br />Corps of Engineers. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />