My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-09-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-09-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:44:09 AM
Creation date
9/10/2009 2:14:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
9/14/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
th <br />ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues <br />Comment Background Information <br />Element Needed which require further direction are highlighted.) <br />86. We should emphasize creative CEQA requires an assessment of the level of No General Plan policy and programs will be reviewed to determine what, if <br />solutions rather than limits regarding significance if the project would expose sensitive any, creative, feasible, appropriate solutions can be proposed. <br />location of sensitive receptors. receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. <br />While understanding the impact of pollution on <br />sensitive receptors, there may also be innovative <br />approaches to mitigate on a project specific basis. <br />In response, the General Plan includes Policy PS-2.1: <br />Avoid placing sensitive uses within 500 feet – or <br />other distance deemed to be appropriate based on <br />project-specific health risk assessment data – of the <br />Port of Redwood City, related heavy industrial <br />areas, and any roadways serving Port uses. <br />87. With regard to sea level rise on No General Plan policy and programs will be reviewed to determine what, if <br /> <br />Public Safety <br />pages PS-5 and 6, we should have any, feasible solutions can be proposed. <br />something more concrete as to what we <br />are going to do as a strategy for our <br />entire waterfront and how it relates to <br />regional strategies. <br />88. Careful about sensitive receptors, Yes Are there additional policies that should be added to address this? <br />and how land use can improve quality <br />of life, e.g. Redwood Village <br /> <br />89. MTC's 2035 plan builds in links to No Staff will review MTC’s plan to determine linkage between it, green jobs, <br />SB375. Discuss how green jobs fit in economic development, and public safety. As appropriate, additional <br />with economic development and also text will be prepared for the General Plan. <br />translate into public safety. <br />90. We should show connection to The Housing Element includes the following policy: No Include reference in Public Safety Element regarding necessity of <br />housing in the Public Safety Element. Policy H-2.4 Develop housing purchase incentives housing for first responders. <br />We diminish public safety response by to encourage Redwood City emergency personnel <br />not providing housing for our first to live in Redwood City. <br />responders. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.