My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-09-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-09-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:44:09 AM
Creation date
9/10/2009 2:14:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
9/14/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
th <br />ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues <br />Comment Background Information <br />Element Needed which require further direction are highlighted.) <br />91. When changing or rerouting truck The Built Environment Element includes the No None <br />routes, we need to be respectful of our following policies: <br />neighborhoods. Policy BE-30.1: Minimize potential conflicts <br />between trucks and pedestrian, bicycle, and transit <br />access and circulation on streets designated as <br />truck routes. <br />The Public Safety Element includes the following <br />policy: <br />Policy PS-2.3: Consider re-routing truck routes and <br />high volumes of non-residential traffic away from <br />residential neighborhoods, particularly high-density <br />residential neighborhoods. <br />92. Greenhouse gas section: We've No Add more information on existing measures the City will continue. <br />already done a number of things, strong <br />measures, and will continue to, <br />including setting benchmarks and <br />working actively to meet them. This <br />information should be included. <br />93. New contract with San Francisco No Receive and review agreement, including appropriate information. Ask <br /> <br />PUC for a 25 year agreement, we should BASWA to review. <br />Natural Resources <br />update the Plan to reflect, and have <br />BASWA review. <br />94. There was a new plan on Page NR-6 discusses groundwater and the More data Please provide reference to groundwater study for staff/consultant <br />groundwater for emergency use, which importance of replenishing aquifers. Upcoming needed review and potential incorporation. <br />involves introducing more water into updates to the 2005 Urban Water Management <br />the aquifers. If that report was accurate, Plan (UWMP) would consider this and any other <br />then we maybe should include some sources of potential water for the City. <br />info here. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.