My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt21 Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Under $100K
>
Agmt21 Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2021 11:54:16 AM
Creation date
7/21/2021 11:52:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
San Mateo County
PROJECT NAME
Anima Control Services AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND THE CITIES
RMP File Number
304
Date
5/26/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> <br />Animal, Spay/Neuter, and Fancier Ordinances, including but not limited <br />to providing hearing officers and a location for the hearings. The cost to <br />hold the hearing will be the sole responsibility of each City and collection <br />of the hearing fee, based on the City’s fee ordinance, will be collected <br />and retained by the City. <br /> <br />However, the Parties agree that, at a City’s option and for its <br />convenience, a City may utilize County offices and/or the services of the <br />County hearing officers for purposes of conducting Dangerous/Vicious <br />Animal Hearings under the provisions of each City’s Dangerous and <br />Vicious Animal Ordinance, Spay/Neuter Hearings under the provision of <br />each City’s Spay/Neuter Ordinance, and/or Fancier Hearings under the <br />provision of each City’s Fancier Ordinance. The hearing fee, based on <br />the City’s fee ordinance, will be collected from the person requesting the <br />hearing by the County under the terms of this Agreement, if possible. If <br />such fee is not collected, the City shall remain responsible for such <br />costs. <br /> <br />The Parties also recognize that in the event a City elects to utilize the <br />services of a County hearing officer, the City remains solely responsible <br />for the defense of any appeal of or challenge to an administrative <br />decision rendered by the hearing officer. Further, the City remains <br />responsible for any claims, damages, costs or other losses resulting <br />from any decision, act or omission of the hearing officer acting in the <br />course and scope of his or her capacity as hearing officer or from any <br />court judgment based on claims, actions or appeals resulting from <br />Dangerous/Vicious Animal hearings, decisions or findings; Spay/Neuter <br />requirements, hearings, decisions or findings; and/or Fancier <br />requirements, hearings, decisions or findings made under each City’s <br />ordinances. <br /> <br />Furthermore, the Parties agree that, at a City’s option and for its <br />convenience, County offices will issue Service Animal tags and <br />Breeder/Fancier Permits on behalf of each City upon County’s <br />determination that such tag or permit shall be issued on behalf of the <br />City. Each City shall remain responsible for the decision to issue or not <br />issue a Service Animal tag and/or issue or not issue a Breeder or <br />Fancier Permit and shall remain responsible the defense of any action or <br />claim and payment of any claims, damages, costs, or other losses <br />resulting from such decision. <br /> <br /> 3.7 In consideration of the services that will be coordinated and facilitated by <br />County and provided by the Animal Control Contractor and Animal <br />Licensing Contractor in accordance with all terms, conditions, and <br />specifications set forth herein, and in the exhibits and attachments <br />incorporated by reference herein, each City shall pay County based on
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.