Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Work Program <br /> <br />June 2021 City of Redwood City / Gatekeeper Projects Subsequent EIR 15 <br />environmental science associates <br /> <br />Ai r Quality <br />The DTPP Final EIR identified potentially significant but mitigable air quality impacts under the DTPP associated <br />with sensitive receptors’ exposure to toxic air contaminants (TACs) during operation (mitigated by <br />implementation of General Plan policies and programs related to filtration, and for preparation of health risk <br />analyses for applicable projects), and odors (mitigated by implementation of odor reduction measures). <br />The SEIR Setting section will update any pertinent changes to the DTPP Final EIR related to regulatory <br />background, analysis approach, and significance thresholds. <br />ESA will address air quality impacts associated with changes to the DTPP as a result of the Gatekeeper Projects. <br />The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) updated its 2010 CEQA Guidelines (referenced in the <br />2010 DTPP Final EIR) in 2017. The significance criteria for evaluating impacts from plans has not changed in the <br />2017 update, and includes the following: <br /> Consistency with the current air quality plan, and <br /> Comparison of project vehicles miles traveled (VMT) growth to project population growth. <br />ESA will use VMT values provided by the transportation analysis conducted in support of the SEIR to evaluate <br />VMT growth compared to population growth. In addition, policies and control measures from the BAAQMD’s <br />most recent, 2017 Bay Area Clean Air Plan (“Spare the Air and Cool the Climate”) will be compared to those <br />included in the proposed projects for evaluation of consistency. Impacts will be discussed qualitatively in <br />comparison to these above significance criteria. Mitigation measures included in the DTPP Final EIR will be <br />evaluated and updated as necessary, based on potential changes to impacts from the Gatekeeper projects. <br />In addition, ESA will include a qualitative analysis of criteria pollutant emissions and health risks from toxic air <br />contaminants (TACs), given that Individual development projects in the DTPP area under the Gatekeeper <br />projects could potentially exceed one or more of BAAQMD’s project-specific criteria pollutant significance <br />thresholds. ESA’s qualitative analyses will reach significance conclusions requiring mitigation, and propose <br />mitigation in order to facilitate tiering of future projects without the need for a supplemental or subsequent <br />project-specific EIR. <br />Consistent with Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) guidance at the time, the DTPP Final EIR <br />analyzed health risk impacts related to exposure of new sensitive receptors (residential uses, schools, child care <br />and the like) to existing levels of air pollutants—the so-called effects of the environment on a project. This <br />approach is inconsistent with the California Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in California Building Industry <br />Association (CBIA) v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, which held that CEQA, with certain exceptions, is <br />concerned with the impacts of a project on the environment, not whether the existing environment may <br />adversely affect a new project. Consequently, the health risk analysis in the SEIR will focus on whether the <br />Gatekeeper projects may exacerbate existing effects of exposure to TACs. <br />ESA will prepare a quantitative health risk assessment of construction and operational impacts from one <br />representative future project. The purpose of this analysis is to create screening criteria for when a future <br />development project, especially the smaller projects, might be well below the BAAQMD health risk significance <br />thresholds, and could therefore avoid further analysis and/or mitigation. This is similar to what the BAAQMD <br />already has developed for criteria pollutants (such as square feet of construction, cubic yards of excavation, and <br />proximity to sensitive receptors). Subsequent development projects in the DTPP area could use these screening <br />REV: 06-23-21 MI <br />ATTY/AGR.2021.150/Environmental Sciences Associates (Gatekeeper Projects) (Page 25 of 58)