AgdaPkt 2009-10-26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

88 Page 30 it is shown on Sheet 1 of Attachment 3 (the Vesting Tentative Map). The easement shall provide that no permanent structures, except fencing, and no impervious surfaces such as paving or decks may be constructed within fifteen feet of the top of the bank of Cordilleras Creek, and that fencing may not extend beyond the top of the bank. The applicant shall prepare and record the easement which shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager or designee prior to recordation. ~ Enhanced Landscapina slona Cordilleras Creek: To compensate for encroachments into the 25...foot setback from the top of bank of Cordilleras Creek, the applicant shall be responsible for providing enhanced landscaping along the creek, which shan include planting additional native trees and vegetation to promote a more natural character to the creek. Prior to or in conjunction with the filing of improvement plans for the site improvements, the applicant shall submit detailed landscaping plans for the enhanced landscaping, include aU vegetation remova" any grading, proposed species and specimen sizes, location of planting, temporary and permanent irrigation. .12:. Fencina alona Cordilleras Creek: The fencing along the rear yards of Lots 1 2, 3 and 4 shall be of an open design, such as wire, wrought iron or split rail finished in dark or earthtone colors. The fencing may not extend beyond the top of bank of Cordilleras Creek. The fencing parallel to the creek shall be constructed as part of the subdivision improvements. There shall be a gate constructed in the fence for each of the four lots adjacent to the creek. The speCific design, materials and color of the fencing shall be submitted as part of the subdivision improvement plans and shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager or designee. .1L. Trees Authorized for Removal: The tree identification numbers used in this condition are shown on Sheet 1 of the Revised Vesting Tentative Map dated October 19,2009. The trees authorized for removal pursuant to Redwood City Municipal Code Section 35.6 are as foUows: a. Trees #23 and #25 are dead and are to be removed. b. Trees #3, #9, #29, #30, #31, #32, #6, and #34 may be removed because they conflict with the proposed project. 1.Trees Authorized for Removal: The tree identification numbers used in this condition are shown on Sheet 1 of the Revised Vesting Tentative Map dated October 19, 2009. The trees authorized for removal pursuant to Redwood City Municipal Code Section 35.6 are as follows: a. Trees #23 and #25 are dead and are to be removed. b. Trees #3, #9, #29, #30, #31. #32, #6, and #34 may be removed because they confnct with the proposed project. c. Trees #21 (strawberry tree), and #27 (Canary Island date palm) are encouraged for retentionl because they are not within building footprints and can add to the maturity of the overall site landscaping. The applicant has proposed that Tree 27 will be moved to a different location while Tree #21 will likely require corrective pruning and has a trunk diameter of less than 12-inches and is thus not a protected tree per the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Tree #21 is located very near proposed structures and will require strict application of tree protection measures to survive (per condition #18, below). d. Trees # 40, #41, and #42 may be removed for poor condition provided that the Arborist retained by the City to prepare a Tree Protection Plan confirms their poor condition and that they are unlikely to survive. 10-26-09 Revised Draft Finger A venue Conditions of Approval