Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments 26 ESA / 202100421.01 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report May 2023 <br />Impact C-PS-2: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, combined with <br />cumulative development in the vicinity and citywide, would not result in significant <br />cumulative impacts to parks and recreation. <br />Cumulative projects, including individual projects proposed under the DTPP Plan-wide <br />Amendments, would be subject to the City’s Parks Impact Fee and parkland dedication <br />requirements (or Parkland In-Lieu Fee) as they are developed, the same as for the proposed DTPP <br />Plan-Wide Amendments. The park projects developed as a result of the City’s Parks Impact Fee <br />and Parkland In-Lieu Fee would be required to undergo environmental review as they are identified. <br />Therefore, when considered in the cumulative context, the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments’ parks <br />and recreation-related impacts would not be cumulatively considerable and would not result in new <br />of more severe cumulative impacts than the impacts identified in the DTPP Final EIR. Cumulative <br />impacts related to parks and recreation would be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-15 to <br />17-16.) <br />Impact C-TR-1: Implementation of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in <br />combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable <br />future projects in the vicinity and Citywide, would not result in a cumulatively considerable <br />contribution to a significant transportation impact. <br />Under 2040 cumulative conditions with the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, the <br />citywide boundary VMT per capita is estimated to be 10.1 miles, which would be less than the <br />citywide VMT per capita of 10.3 miles without the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments. <br />Therefore, the impact of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments on VMT would be less than <br />significant. Furthermore, the effect of roadway network changes proposed by the DTPP Plan-Wide <br />Amendments was found to not have a substantial effect on VMT. Therefore, implementation of the <br />proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA <br />Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). The proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would <br />not contribute considerably to any new significant VMT impacts. The impact would be less than <br />significant and no mitigation measures would be required. The same City design standards and <br />requirements that must be met for individual project approvals identified for increased hazards and <br />emergency access would also apply to any and all other cumulative project that could be <br />approved/built under the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments. As a result, the proposed DTPP <br />Plan-Wide Amendments would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a <br />significant transportation impact and would not result in new or more severe cumulative impacts <br />than the impacts identified in the DTPP Final EIR. Therefore, the impact would be less than <br />significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-16 to 17-20.) <br />Impact C-UT-2: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in combination with <br />past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the <br />vicinity and Citywide, would not contribute considerably to cumulative impacts on solid <br />waste. <br />San Mateo County is currently revising the Siting Element of its Countywide Integrated <br />Waste Management Plan, which will identify facilities and proposed programs that would provide <br />San Mateo County with sufficient disposal capacity to meet the statutorily required minimum of