Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments 27 ESA / 202100421.01 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report May 2023 <br />15 years of combined permitted disposal capacity (Public Resources Code Section 41260). <br />Cumulative development projects would also be required to comply with federal, state, and local <br />solid waste standards, including waste diversion during construction, including at least 65 percent <br />construction and demolition waste diversion, and during operation, including recycling and organic <br />material diversion requirements. As such, non-renewable sources of solid waste and the solid waste <br />disposal requirements of cumulative development would be reduced. Therefore, when considered <br />in the cumulative context, the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments’ solid waste-related <br />impacts would not be cumulatively considerable and would not result in new or more severe <br />cumulative impacts than what was identified in the DTPP Final EIR. Cumulative impacts would, <br />therefore, be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, p. 17-25.) <br />Impact C-UT-3: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in combination with <br />past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the <br />vicinity and Citywide, would not contribute considerably to cumulative impacts on hydrology <br />and water quality. <br />While future developments in the amended DTPP area could contribute cumulatively to <br />hydrology and water quality impacts, all new developments would be subject to the same local and <br />state laws and regulations. Compliance with these laws would address any potential impacts to <br />hydrology and water quality. As all new development within the amended DTPP area would be <br />within the amended DTPP area would be subject to the same local and state laws (i.e., the City, <br />County, and the RWQCB), the cumulative impacts to related to hydrology and water quality from <br />implementation of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not be considerable and <br />would not result in new or more severe cumulative impacts than the impacts identified in the DTPP <br />Final EIR. Cumulative impacts would therefore be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-26 to <br />17-27.) <br />Impact C-NO-1: Implementation of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in <br />combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable <br />future projects in the vicinity, would not contribute considerably to cumulative noise impacts. <br />The traffic noise associated with the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not <br />represent a cumulatively considerable contribution to this cumulative impact and would, in fact, <br />serve to reduce this predicted significant cumulative impact. While there would be a cumulative <br />traffic noise impact along four of the 20 roadways analyzed, the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide <br />Amendments would not contribute to this cumulative impact and would not result in new or more <br />severe cumulative impacts than the impacts identified in the DTPP Final EIR. The cumulative <br />traffic noise impacts resulting from the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would be less than <br />significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-26 to 17-28.)