Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments 28 ESA / 202100421.01 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report May 2023 <br />Impact C-AQ-3: Adoption of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in combination <br />with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, <br />would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to local odor impacts. <br />The amended DTPP area does not contain any major sources of odor that would contribute <br />to a cumulative odor impact in the vicinity. Odor sources associated with food service <br />establishments in the amended DTPP area would be enforced through compliance with BAAQMD <br />Rule 6-2. Therefore, the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments’ cumulative impact with respect <br />to odors would not result in new or more severe cumulative impacts than what was identified in the <br />DTPP Final EIR. Cumulative impacts would not be considerable and therefore would be less than <br />significant. (Draft SEIR, p. 17-31.) <br />Impact C-CC-2: The proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in conjunction with past, <br />present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the City, <br />would not result in energy use that would be considered wasteful and unnecessary or conflict <br />with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency under <br />cumulative conditions. <br />The proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in conjunction with cumulative <br />development in the City, would allow increased development in an already developed area and <br />result in increased energy consumption. Potential impacts to energy resources from future <br />development in the amended DTPP area would require applications for development permits that <br />would be evaluated for code compliance on a case-by-case basis. Thus, all subsequent development <br />projects proposed within the amended DTPP area would be subject to compliance with all federal, <br />state, and local requirements for energy efficiency, including the California Energy Code Building <br />Energy Efficiency Standards, the CALGreen Code, and SB 743. Consequently, subsequent projects <br />within the amended DTPP area would not result in significant environmental impacts from the <br />wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during construction or <br />operation; and would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or <br />energy efficiency. Therefore, the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not result in new <br />or more severe cumulative impacts than were identified in the DTPP Final EIR and the cumulative <br />energy impact would be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-32 to 17-33.) <br />Impact C-HAZ-1: The proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in combination with past, <br />present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would result <br />in less-than-significant cumulative impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. <br />Other projects and developments being implemented in the area will be required to comply <br />with the same existing laws and regulations with which future developments allowed under the <br />proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments will comply. Further, all new development within the <br />amended DTPP area would be subject to existing laws and regulations and subject to applicable <br />best management practices and similar mitigation measures. With respect to the potential for R&D <br />Laboratory uses to operate within the DTPP Plan area under the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide <br />Amendments, each R&D Laboratory development would need to acquire the applicable hazardous <br />materials-related permits specific for that development; register the hazardous materials specific <br />for that development through the County’s Hazardous Materials Business Plan Program; comply