Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REV: 11-07-23 SK <br />subject to additional compensation and an amendment to the scope of <br />work. <br />• Response to Comments. MIG anticipates minimal public comments <br />on the IS/MND and EA/FONSI project. This scope of work includes up <br />to 16 hours of labor to catalog and respond to comments received during <br />the public comment period. If the number of actual comment letters <br />received or the comments require additional new analysis, <br />Consultant would alert the City and request additional budget to <br />respond. <br />• Meetings and Hearings. The number of proposed meetings and <br />hearings are identified in Tasks 2 of this Scope of Work. Attendance at <br />additional meetings or hearings would be considered additional <br />services. City staff will be responsible for all meeting logistics and <br />notices. <br />• Hours. This scope of work limits Consultant’s level of effort to the <br />hours identified and that any technical analyses not specifically <br />described in the scope is not covered. <br />• CEQA Public Noticing Requirements. MIG will prepare and send <br />filings to the State Clearinghouse as noted in the scope of work. The <br />City shall be responsible for all other public noticing including but not <br />limited to direct mailings to interested parties and neighbors, <br />publication of notices in a newspaper of general circulation, and filing <br />CEQA notices (NOI and NOD) with the County Clerk’s office. <br />• Schedule Delays. The budget reflects the anticipated CEQA/NEPA <br />schedule. Should the project experience extended delays, or starts and <br />stops of work, the City will be notified by Consultant to request <br />additional budget to account for the extended schedule. <br />• Project Initiation and Kick-off Meeting/Site Visit: <br />• Within one week of the start of work, MIG will provide the <br />City/Engineering team with a data request for any background materials <br />and data needed for the preparation of the Initial Study. MIG would <br />review available background materials (i.e., previous environmental <br />documentation and conceptual approaches to design and construction) <br />and ask questions of City/Engineering team staff to gain a complete <br />understanding of the proposed project activities. Consultant will <br />coordinate directly with City staff on expectations and City practices <br />regarding the CEQA/NEPA process. <br />• This budget includes participation in a conference call project kick- <br />off meeting and conducting a site visit to document existing site <br />conditions. <br />• Task deliverable: data request (electronic only) submitted <br />within one week of Notice to Proceed. <br />• IS/MND <br />ATTY/AGR.2023.241/BKF Engineers (Price Tract Pump Station Design) (Page 34 of 68)