My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2024.07.15 Speaker Cards-PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2024.07.15 Speaker Cards-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2024 11:10:22 AM
Creation date
7/17/2024 11:08:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Date
7/15/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 & 99 MAPLE STREET- FRANKLIN APARTMENTS Completed: 206 unit <br />apartment community on a 4 acre site. <br /> 1500 EL CAMINO REAL-VILLA MONTGOMERY Completed: 58 affordable <br />apartment units. <br /> <br />• Our neighborhood has already suffered through over 3 – 4 years of construction during <br />a time when we were confined during the pandemic and so were stuck with the noise, <br />trucks, and impeded access to our daily life routines. Opening the door to more high- <br />density housing makes no sense from an urban planning perspective. Since construction <br />has finished, we've experienced higher traffic and increased street parking. Adding the <br />prospect of traffic and other impacts from high density housing is just piling on. <br /> <br />• There are other areas in Redwood City that can be developed for Low-Income High- <br />Density Housing, and it doesn’t make sense to have it all clustered together in one area. <br />Our area can't continue to be the "go-to" for city projects. <br /> <br />• The study has not been done to understand the traffic/burdens that will impact having <br />more high-density housing will have on the traffic in our area. There is no parking being <br />provided for these 178 units. The neighborhood cannot support this number of cars. <br />Most likely all the residents will need cars to get to their jobs, although public <br />transportation is close – it does not connect to all potential jobsites. It is not <br />responsible for the Council to open the door to additional impacts on our neighborhood. <br />Our neighborhood should not be thrown under the bus just because they need to meet <br />a deadline. <br /> <br />• The developer should be required to show data from similar nearby projects what <br />percentage of residents have no vehicles? This neighborhood seems to be already <br />slammed with tons of vehicles. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.