Reso PC21-03 0034 PC Reso 935 Durlston Road

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0034/PC RESO 935 DURLSTON ROAD REV: 05-27-21 VR Page 3 of 8 project and ensure that the addition is compatible with and does not adversely affect the character of the existing home. The project does not include a formal designation request at this time. Richard Patenaude, architectural historian, was asked to evaluate the proposed additions under the Secretary of Interior Standards (Attachment 4). The report finds that the proposed project complies with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and, therefore, does not negatively impact the architectural character of the dwelling, nor its eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources or local designation. This report reviewed under the Secretary of Interior Standards does not include any design changes or recommended modifications to the project. Upon reviewing the plans, supporting materials, and the report, staff finds the proposed structure is consistent with the size and scale of the neighborhood, which consists of mainly two-story structures. By retaining and utilizing a matching architectural style and exterior materials, the proposed additions would not detract from the existing home. Specifically, the existing exterior materials of stucco would be incorporated throughout the new addition, window types and styles would be consistent, and the design incorporates matching roof-slopes, utilizing the same Spanish tile roofing material. The addition would include subtle differences in architectural detailing such as providing new clay tile pipe vents, rounded decorative flooring joists at new overhang areas, and simplified eave rafters. The differentiation between old and new materials and forms is further indicated on Sheet A5.1 of the project plans. However, the distinctive materials, features and finishes, construction techniques and examples of craftsmanship that characterize the property’s historic integrity will be preserved. It is staff’s conclusion that the proposed project is harmonious with the existing structure on site and will not adversely impact its character. B. In the case of any property located within a historic district, the proposed construction, removal, rehabilitation alteration, remodeling, excavation or exterior alteration conforms to the prescriptive standards as adopted by the Commission, and does not adversely affect the character of the district; or This criteria not applicable. The property is not within a historic district. C. In the case of construction of a new improvement, building, or structure upon a historic site, the exterior of such improvements will not adversely affect and will be compatible with the external appearance of existing designated improvements, buildings, and structures on said site. This criteria not applicable. The property is not a historic site. 4. Architectural Permit Findings. The Planning Commission is able make the required findings for approval of an Architectural Permit (Zoning Ordinance Section 45.4). Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that: