Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 13 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />9. Transportation and Circulation <br />Impact TR-1: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, <br />including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. <br />The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would be consistent with and promote <br />General Plan, DTPP policies, and RWCmoves goals for the Downtown area, and thus, <br />implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not conflict with a <br />program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, <br />bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not result <br />in new or more severe circulation-related impacts than the impacts identified in the DTPP Final <br />EIR. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be <br />required. (Draft SEIR, pp. 9-18 to 9-22.) <br />Impact TR-2: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). <br />Under 2040 cumulative conditions with the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, <br />the citywide boundary VMT per capita is estimated to be 10.01 miles, which would be less than <br />the citywide VMT per capita of 10.38 miles without the proposed Transit District DTPP <br />Amendments. Therefore, the impact of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments on VMT <br />would be less than significant. Furthermore, the effect of roadway network changes proposed by <br />the Transit District DTPP Amendments was found to not have a substantial effect on VMT. <br />Therefore, implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not conflict <br />or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). The proposed Transit <br />District DTPP Amendments would not result in new significant VMT impacts. The impact would <br />be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. (Draft SEIR, pp. 9-22 to 9- <br />28.) <br />Impact TR-3: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). <br />As detailed street designs associated with the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments <br />are developed, any roadway extensions and new streets would need to comply with the DTPP, <br />RWCmoves and the Street Design Criteria included in the City’s Engineering Standards, all of <br />which include design specifications to ensure safe and efficient travel of vehicles, bicycles, <br />pedestrians, and transit vehicles. Therefore, the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments <br />would not introduce any geometric design features or incompatible uses, and would not result in a <br />new or more severe impact related to traffic hazards than the impact identified in the DTPP Final <br />EIR. This impact would be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp 9-27 to 9-28.)