Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 24 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />cumulative impacts on aesthetics. With respect to light and glare, compliance with Title 24 <br />standards would improve the quality of outdoor lighting and reduce the cumulative impacts of light <br />pollution, light trespass and glare to less than significant levels. The proposed Transit District <br />DTPP Amendments development projects would also not increase the potential for shadow beyond <br />that analyzed in the DTPP Final EIR, and therefore the proposed amendments would not contribute <br />to any potential increased shadow from cumulative development. As a result, the cumulative impact <br />of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments in combination with cumulative projects would <br />not result in new or more severe cumulative impacts than the impacts identified in the DTPP Final <br />EIR. The cumulative impact would be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-9 to 17-10.) <br />Impact C-CR-1: The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, in combination with <br />past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would <br />result in less-than-significant cumulative impacts related to cultural, historic, and tribal <br />cultural resources. <br />The Transit District area does not contain historic resources or historic districts, and there <br />are no adjacent historic districts, and therefore, the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments <br />would not result in additional impacts to historic architectural resources. When considered together <br />with other projects within and adjacent to the Transit District area, the less-than-significant impacts <br />to cultural and historical resources do not considerably contribute to the significant cumulative <br />impact identified in the 2010 DTPP Final EIR and would not result in new or more severe <br />cumulative impacts. Therefore, the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments’ contribution to <br />the cumulative impact related to cultural and historic resources and tribal cultural resources would <br />be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-10 to 17-11.) <br />Impact C-PS-1: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, <br />combined with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future <br />projects in the vicinity and Citywide, would not result in an adverse cumulative increase in <br />demand for public services that would require new or physically altered governmental <br />facilities, construction of which could have significant physical environmental impacts. <br />The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, in combination with cumulative <br />projects in the vicinity would increase the demand for police services, fire protection and <br />emergency medical response services, public schools, and libraries. With respect to cumulative <br />demand for police protection, should the Redwood City Police Department (RCPD) determine that <br />an additional police substation or community policing center is necessary within the DTPP area as <br />a result of cumulative development, the facility would likely be incorporated into an existing or <br />otherwise‐planned structure similar to the existing Downtown Substation and would not result in <br />significant environmental impacts. With respect to cumulative demand for fire protection, if and <br />when the construction or expansion of Redwood City Fire Department (RCFD) facilities to <br />accommodate additional fire personnel or equipment becomes necessary as a result of cumulative <br />development, CEQA review, General Plan provisions, and City and Zoning Code regulations would <br />all apply, thereby avoiding significant environmental impacts. Similar to individual projects <br />developed within the Transit District area, cumulative projects would be subject to school impact <br />fees which would fully mitigate the potential effect on public school facilities from the new student