My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:31:33 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:31:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
10/25/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 24 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />cumulative impacts on aesthetics. With respect to light and glare, compliance with Title 24 <br />standards would improve the quality of outdoor lighting and reduce the cumulative impacts of light <br />pollution, light trespass and glare to less than significant levels. The proposed Transit District <br />DTPP Amendments development projects would also not increase the potential for shadow beyond <br />that analyzed in the DTPP Final EIR, and therefore the proposed amendments would not contribute <br />to any potential increased shadow from cumulative development. As a result, the cumulative impact <br />of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments in combination with cumulative projects would <br />not result in new or more severe cumulative impacts than the impacts identified in the DTPP Final <br />EIR. The cumulative impact would be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-9 to 17-10.) <br />Impact C-CR-1: The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, in combination with <br />past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would <br />result in less-than-significant cumulative impacts related to cultural, historic, and tribal <br />cultural resources. <br />The Transit District area does not contain historic resources or historic districts, and there <br />are no adjacent historic districts, and therefore, the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments <br />would not result in additional impacts to historic architectural resources. When considered together <br />with other projects within and adjacent to the Transit District area, the less-than-significant impacts <br />to cultural and historical resources do not considerably contribute to the significant cumulative <br />impact identified in the 2010 DTPP Final EIR and would not result in new or more severe <br />cumulative impacts. Therefore, the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments’ contribution to <br />the cumulative impact related to cultural and historic resources and tribal cultural resources would <br />be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 17-10 to 17-11.) <br />Impact C-PS-1: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, <br />combined with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future <br />projects in the vicinity and Citywide, would not result in an adverse cumulative increase in <br />demand for public services that would require new or physically altered governmental <br />facilities, construction of which could have significant physical environmental impacts. <br />The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, in combination with cumulative <br />projects in the vicinity would increase the demand for police services, fire protection and <br />emergency medical response services, public schools, and libraries. With respect to cumulative <br />demand for police protection, should the Redwood City Police Department (RCPD) determine that <br />an additional police substation or community policing center is necessary within the DTPP area as <br />a result of cumulative development, the facility would likely be incorporated into an existing or <br />otherwise‐planned structure similar to the existing Downtown Substation and would not result in <br />significant environmental impacts. With respect to cumulative demand for fire protection, if and <br />when the construction or expansion of Redwood City Fire Department (RCFD) facilities to <br />accommodate additional fire personnel or equipment becomes necessary as a result of cumulative <br />development, CEQA review, General Plan provisions, and City and Zoning Code regulations would <br />all apply, thereby avoiding significant environmental impacts. Similar to individual projects <br />developed within the Transit District area, cumulative projects would be subject to school impact <br />fees which would fully mitigate the potential effect on public school facilities from the new student
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.