My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:31:33 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:31:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
10/25/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 40 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br /> To lower the parking requirement to reflect anticipated reduced future parking demand, current <br />best practices and future plans for Caltrain track expansion that will encourage nondriving <br />modes of transportation while continuing to incentivize shared parking and the ability for <br />project applicants to pay a fee to the City in lieu of providing new parking spaces; <br /> To require frontage improvements to support active transportation consistent with RWCmoves, <br />Redwood City’s Citywide Transportation Plan; with the City’s El Camino Real Corridor Plan; <br />and with the City’s in-progress Vision Zero strategy to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe <br />injuries and the RWC Walk Bike Thrive initiative; <br /> To provide options for more design flexibility to allow for increased diversity in architecture <br />and style; and <br /> To maintain existing DTPP maximum building height limits (i.e., no changes to the maximum <br />allowable height) in the proposed Transit District, but allow for some development flexibility <br />by permitting limited exceptions to building placement requirements (i.e., build-to-corner, <br />building setback, and frontage coverage requirements) to allow corner setbacks, other setbacks <br />from the street, and lesser lot coverage than is currently required; and lowering the required <br />minimum heights from 35 feet to 25 feet, or less with a potential exception. The exceptions <br />would allow for reduced massing and shadows, an enhanced pedestrian experience, and provide <br />support for ground floor retail. <br />B. Significant Environmental Impacts of the Project <br />Based on the analyses in Chapters 4 through 17 of the DSEIR, the City has determined that <br />all of the proposed Project’s potentially significant environmental effects would be avoided or <br />reduced to less-than-significant levels through implementation of the mitigation measures <br />described in the DSEIR and MMRP, except for the following: <br /> Impact AQ-2: Adoption of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would result in <br />a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region <br />is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. <br /> Impact CC-1: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not <br />generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant <br />impact on the environment. <br /> Impact CC-2: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not <br />conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the <br />emissions of greenhouse gases. <br /> Impact C-AQ-1: Adoption of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would result <br />in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the regional cumulative air quality impacts. <br /> Impact C-CC-1: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, in <br />combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future <br />projects, would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to GHG emissions that <br />may have a significant impact on the environment or conflict with applicable plans, policies or <br />regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.