My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:31:33 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:31:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
10/25/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 39 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />conservatively determined to be significant and unavoidable. The City Council hereby <br />finds, however, that there are specific economic, environmental, social, legal, technological <br />and other considerations that make infeasible the potential mitigation measures described <br />in the SEIR to mitigate the effect of Impact CC-1, and that development of the Project will <br />provide specific economic, environmental, social, legal, technological and other benefits <br />that will outweigh the significant adverse effects of Impact C-CC-1, as set forth in the <br />Statement of Overriding Considerations below. This finding is based on the entire record <br />of proceedings for the Project, including but not limited to the discussion and analysis set <br />forth on pages 17-26 through 17-27 of the DSEIR, which includes a full statement of the <br />impact and is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety. <br />VI. Findings Regarding Project Alternatives <br />The CEQA Guidelines require that an EIR describe a reasonable range of alternatives that <br />would feasibly attain most of the basic project objectives but would avoid or substantially lessen <br />any of the significant environmental effects of the project, and then evaluate the comparative merits <br />of such alternatives. (Guidelines §15126(a)). <br />A. City’s Objectives for the Project <br />The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would consist of amendments to the <br />Redwood City General Plan and DTPP to achieve the following City objectives: <br /> To establish a new sub-area within the DTPP—the Transit District—focused on transit oriented <br />development with a new hub of office, residential and retail uses adjacent to the Redwood City <br />Transit Center, including the Caltrain Station and the SamTrans bus depot, thereby potentially <br />minimizing automobile travel and vehicle miles traveled, consistent with the City’s greenhouse <br />gas reduction goals. <br /> To allow for redevelopment of the existing Transit Center and Sequoia Station properties with <br />a mix of retail, office, and residential uses that is responsive to market demands and can be <br />constructed within existing height limitations (i.e., no changes to the maximum height allowed) <br />and that maximizes development potential of the area in terms of both job and housing <br />opportunities; <br /> To anticipate a potential future four-track Caltrain station, north of the existing station, that <br />would allow for expanded service with completion of Caltrain’s electrification program <br />(currently under construction) and for long-term implementation of the Caltrain Business Plan, <br />which calls for substantially increased frequency of service and the use of the Redwood City <br />Transit Center as a transfer point between local and express trains; <br /> To designate land uses appropriate to the Transit District area and the total amount of <br />development to be permitted in the Transit District area. To that end, establish a separate <br />development cap for office use that is distinct from, and not subject to, the office cap applicable <br />to the remainder of the DTPP, and to allow residential uses that contribute to a thriving hub of <br />office, residential and retail uses; <br /> To make circulation improvements to promote quality vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian <br />connections;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.