My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:31:33 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:31:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
10/25/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 47 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />The Altered Land Use Mix Alternative, similar to the proposed Transit District DTPP <br />Amendments, would have less-than-significant impacts with respect to population and housing <br />less-than-significant impacts with respect to population and housing because it would not induce <br />substantial unplanned growth and would not result in residential displacement. <br />The Altered Land Use Mix Alternative would result in less-than-significant impacts with <br />respect to public services (police, fire, and emergency medical services; parks and recreational <br />facilities; schools; and libraries), as under the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. The <br />Altered Land Use Mix Alternative would also have less-than significant impacts with respect to <br />utilities and infrastructure (including water quality; groundwater recharge; storm drainage; flood <br />hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation; and <br />consistency with a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan), as <br />under the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. Annual water demand would be reduced <br />by approximately 10 percent, compared to that with the proposed Transit District DTPP <br />Amendments, but would be about 31 percent greater than with the Reduced Development <br />Alternative, because residential use is generally more water-intensive than most non-residential <br />uses. <br />Effects related to the footprint of subsequent development projects under the Altered Land <br />Use Mix Alternative would generally be the same as or similar to those of the proposed Transit <br />District DTPP Amendments although lesser overall development would occur within the proposed <br />Transit District area, including related to disturbance of archaeological or tribal cultural resources, <br />potential exposure during construction to subsurface soil or groundwater contamination, potential <br />disturbance of paleontological resources, effects on historical resources, effects on corrosive soils <br />and impacts on biological resources; and would be similarly mitigated to less than significant level <br />with implementation of mitigation. As with the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, <br />effects of the Altered Land Use Mix Alternative would be less than significant with respect to land <br />use and aesthetics (including shadow). <br />As discussed above, on the whole, due to the overall reduced scale of development, this <br />alternative would provide a greater decrease in significant environmental impacts, compared to those <br />of the proposed project, although less than that which would occur under the Reduced Development <br />Alternative. As with the Reduced Development Alternative, the Altered Land Use Mix Alternative <br />would not substantially lessen or avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality and climate change <br />impacts of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. In addition, to the extent that the <br />demand for additional developed office space that would otherwise be built pursuant to the proposed <br />project would be met elsewhere in the Bay Area, employees in such development could potentially <br />generate greater impacts on transportation systems (including VMT), air quality, and greenhouse <br />gases than would be the case for development on the more compact and better-served-by-transit <br />project site. This would be particularly likely for development in more outlying parts of the region <br />where fewer services and less transit access is provided. As with the Reduced Development <br />Alternative, it is acknowledged that the Altered Land Use Mix Alternative would incrementally <br />reduce local impacts in and around the project site and in Downtown Redwood City, while potentially <br />increasing regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gases, as well as regional traffic <br />congestion.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.