Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 48 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />The Altered Land Use Mix Alternative would provide 36 percent more housing (+500 <br />units) within the Transit District area than which would occur under the proposed Transit District <br />DTPP Amendments, and consequently would serve to better achieve housing-related project <br />objectives than the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments and the Reduced Development <br />Alternative. However, the Altered Land Use Mix Alternative would provide for only <br />approximately one-half the new office development (850,000 square feet, or 780,000 square feet <br />under the development cap) within the Transit District area compared to that which would occur <br />under the Transit District DTPP Amendments. As such, this alternative would not fully meet key <br />project objectives for establishing office uses adjacent to the Redwood City Transit Center; <br />responding to market demands for office uses; and maximizing the development potential of the <br />Transit District Area for job opportunities. As a result, the Reduced Development Alternative <br />would not achieve the City’s office land use-related objectives for the Project to the same degree <br />as the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. <br />Because the Altered Land Use Mix Alternative would not be expected to substantially <br />reduce or avoid any of the significant effects that are expected from the mitigated Project, and <br />because this alternative would not achieve the City’s office development-related objectives for the <br />Project to the same degree as the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, the City hereby <br />rejects the Altered Land Use Mix Alternative from further consideration. <br />Findings Relating to the Reduced Office Alternative <br />Findings. The Reduced Office Alternative was added as a revision to the Draft SEIR in <br />response to comments received. The Reduced Office Alternative would reduce the cap on office <br />development in the Transit District to 1.23 million square feet instead of 1.63 million square feet <br />(i.e. about 75 percent of the office space in the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments). <br />Given that the Reduced Office Alternative would only lower the cap on office uses and would not <br />otherwise affect the proposed housing, the Reduced Office Alternative would have similar impacts <br />as those of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, including the same significant effects <br />as the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, albeit to a lesser degree. This alternative <br />would still achieve the City’s objectives for the Project, including the office development-related <br />objectives, by providing 1.23 million square feet of office space and the same number of residential <br />units as the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. <br />Explanation. Under the Reduced Office Alternative, impacts related to the intensity of <br />development—traffic; criteria air pollutants, toxic air contaminants, and greenhouse gas emissions; <br />noise and vibration; population or employment; and demand for public services and utilities—would <br />generally be reduced, compared to those of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. <br />All transportation impacts of the Reduced Office Alternative would be less than significant, <br />as with the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. In fact, the Reduced Office Alternative <br />would result in 16 percent fewer daily vehicle trips and a similar decrease in daily VMT, compared <br />to the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. The Reduced Office Alternative would <br />generate incrementally greater VMT per resident but incrementally lesser VMT per employee than <br />would the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendment, although both the residential and office