Reso PC22-06 0079 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR

Browse Search

Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 50 ESA / 202100421.00 Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation; and consistency with a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan), as under the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. Annual water demand would be reduced by approximately 14 percent, compared to that with the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. Annual water demand would be approximately 5 percent less than the Altered Land Use Mix Alternative, and about 37 percent greater than with the Reduced Development Alternative. Effects related to the footprint of subsequent development projects under the Reduced Office Alternative would generally be the same as or similar to those of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments although lesser office development would occur within the proposed Transit District area, including related to disturbance of archaeological or tribal cultural resources, potential exposure during construction to subsurface soil or groundwater contamination, potential disturbance of paleontological resources, effects on historical resources, effects on corrosive soils and impacts on biological resources; and would be similarly mitigated to less than significant level with implementation of mitigation. As with the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, effects of the Reduced Office Alternative would be less than significant with respect to land use and aesthetics (including shadow). As discussed above, on the whole, due to the overall reduced scale of development, this alternative would provide a decrease in significant environmental impacts, compared to those of the proposed project, although the decrease would be to a lesser degree than that which would occur under the Reduced Development Alternative. As with the Reduced Development Alternative, the Reduced Office Alternative would not substantially lessen or avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality and climate change impacts of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. In addition, to the extent that the demand for additional developed office space that would otherwise be built pursuant to the proposed project would be met elsewhere in the Bay Area, employees in such development could potentially generate greater impacts on transportation systems (including VMT), air quality, and greenhouse gases than would be the case for development on the more compact and better-served-by-transit project site. This would be particularly likely for development in more outlying parts of the region where fewer services and less transit access is provided. As with the Reduced Development Alternative, it is acknowledged that the Reduced Office Alternative would incrementally reduce local impacts in and around the project site and in Downtown Redwood City, while potentially increasing regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gases, as well as regional traffic congestion. The Reduced Office Alternative would provide the same amount of housing within the Transit District area as under the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments, and consequently would serve to achieve housing-related project objectives similar to the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments. However, the Reduced Office Alternative would provide for only approximately 75 percent of the new office development within the Transit District area compared to that which would occur under the Transit District DTPP Amendments. Nevertheless, the Reduced Office Alternative would address each of the City’s objectives for the proposed project, particularly with respect to housing, as the number of housing units would remain the same as with