Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Harbor View Project PAGE 13 OF 48 ESA / 170951 <br />Final Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />ATTY/RESO.0085/PC RESO RECOMMENDING CEQA – EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 11-02-2022 VR <br />Impact HYD-1.CU: The Project, combined with cumulative development in the vicinity of the <br />Project site, would not result in significant cumulative impacts to hydrology and water quality. <br />Findings Regarding Impact HYD-1.CU: While future cumulative development in the <br />area could contribute cumulatively to hydrology and water quality impacts, all new developments <br />would be subject to the same local and state laws and regulations. Compliance with these laws <br />would address any potential impacts to hydrology and water quality. Therefore, the cumulative <br />impacts to related to hydrology and water quality, in combination with sea level rise, from <br />cumulative development and the Revised Project would not be considerable. The impact would be <br />less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-18 to 4.8-19; FEIR, p. 2-15.) <br />4.9 Land Use and Planning <br />Impact LU-1: The proposed Project would not result in the physical division of an established <br />community or conflict with adjacent or nearby land uses. <br />Findings Regarding Impact LU-1: Development of the Revised Project in this location <br />would serve as a transition between the industrial port area and the waterfront area, benefiting <br />existing and envisioned aspects of the waterfront-related area to the west of the Project site. <br />Therefore, development of the Revised Project would not physically divide any established <br />adjacent areas, and would tend to provide a needed transition and linkage between these two areas. <br />The impact would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.9-17; FEIR, p. 2-15.) <br />Impact LU-2: The proposed Project would not conflict with applicable land use plans and <br />policies adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. <br />Findings Regarding Impact LU-2: The Project Sponsor has requested to amend the <br />General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and Map to accommodate the proposed commercial office on <br />the site. With that request applied, the proposed Revised Project would be consistent with the <br />General Plan vision for a Redwood Creek/Harbor Center neighborhood, as also detailed in FEIR <br />Table 4-2 (updated from DEIR Table 4.9-1. The Revised Project does not have a substantial conflict <br />with any plan or policy, including with consideration of mitigation measures identified in this EIR. <br />Although the Revised Project’s use of standard off-street parking requirements could conflict with <br />the General Plan’s goals that encourage use of alternative parking (through reduced parking <br />supply), the Revised Project would also implement the TDM Plan subject to approval by the City <br />and C/CAG, aimed at vehicle trip reduction. Taken together, the Project would not conflict with <br />applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations, including those adopted for the purpose of <br />avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect. The impact would be less than significant. (DEIR, <br />pp. 4.9-18 to 4.9-19; FEIR, p. 2-15.) <br />Impact LU-1.CU: The Project, in combination with cumulative development in the vicinity of <br />the Project site, would not result in cumulative impacts to land use and planning. <br />Findings Regarding Impact LU-1.CU: As analyzed in Impacts LU-1 and LU-2, <br />development of the Revised Project would not physically divide an established community nor would <br />it conflict with applicable land use plans, policies or regulations—specifically those adopted for the <br />purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. As an appropriate transition between two <br />neighborhoods where buffering is warranted, the Revised Project would not have a potential adverse