My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-14 0114 PC Reso Certifying Final EIR 557 E. Bayshore Road
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-14 0114 PC Reso Certifying Final EIR 557 E. Bayshore Road
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:40:13 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
12/13/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.0114/PC RESO CERTIFYING FINAL EIR – 557 E. BAYSHORE ROAD <br />REV: 12-09-22 VR <br />Page 9 of 61 <br /> <br />3. Air Quality. These findings regarding the Project’s potential air quality impacts are based <br />on the analyses on pages 32 through 46 of the DEIR, which are hereby incorporated herein in <br />its entirety. <br /> <br />Impact AIR-1: The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of <br />the applicable air quality plan. <br /> <br />Impact AIR-4: The Project would not result in other emissions (such as those <br />leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. <br /> <br />Impact AIR-C: The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable <br />contribution to a significant air quality impact. <br /> <br />4. Biological Resources. These findings regarding the Project’s potential impacts on <br />biological resources are based on the analyses on pages 47 to 81 of the DEIR, which are hereby <br />incorporated herein in its entirety. <br /> <br />Impact BIO-3: The Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or <br />federally protected wetlands through direct removal, filling, hydrological <br />interruption, or other means. <br /> <br />Impact BIO-4: The Project would not interfere substantially with the movement <br />of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native <br />resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife <br />nursery sites. <br /> <br />Impact BIO-5: The Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances <br />protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. <br /> <br />Impact BIO-6: The Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted <br />Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other <br />approved local, region, or state habitat conservation plan. <br /> <br />5. Cultural Resources. These findings regarding the Project’s potential impacts on cultural <br />resources are based on the analyses on pages 82 to 89 of the DEIR, which are hereby <br />incorporated herein in its entirety. <br /> <br />Impact CUL-1: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. <br /> <br />Impact CUL-2: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15064.5. <br /> <br />Impact CUL-3: The Project would not disturb any human remains, including those
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.