My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-14 0114 PC Reso Certifying Final EIR 557 E. Bayshore Road
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-14 0114 PC Reso Certifying Final EIR 557 E. Bayshore Road
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:40:13 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
12/13/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.0114/PC RESO CERTIFYING FINAL EIR – 557 E. BAYSHORE ROAD <br />REV: 12-09-22 VR <br />Page 8 of 61 <br />1. Aesthetics. These findings regarding the Project’s potential aesthetic impacts are based <br />on the analyses on pages 19 through 28 of the DEIR, which are hereby incorporated herein in <br />its entirety. <br />Impact AES-1: Implementation of the Project would not have a substantial adverse <br />effect on a scenic vista. <br />Impact AES-2: Implementation of the Project would not substantially degrade the <br />view from a scenic highway. <br />Impact AES-3: Implementation of the Project would not substantially <br />degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. <br />Impact AES-4: Implementation of the Project would not expose people on- <br />or off-site to substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or <br />nighttime views in the area. <br />Impact AES-C: The Project, in combination with past, present, and reasonably <br />foreseeable projects, would result in less-than-significant cumulative impacts with <br />respect to aesthetics. <br /> <br />2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources. The finding that the Project would not have any <br />impacts on agricultural and forestry resources is based on the analysis on pages 29 through 31 <br />of the DEIR, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety. <br /> <br />Impact AG-1: The project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, <br />or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant <br />to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California <br />Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. <br /> <br />Impact AG-2: The project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural <br />use, or a Williamson Act contract <br /> <br />Impact AG-3: The project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause <br />rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. <br />(No <br />Impact) <br /> <br />Impact AG-4: The project would not result in a loss of forest land or conversion <br />of forest land to non-forest use. <br /> <br />Impact AG-5: The project would not involve other changes in the existing <br />environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of <br />Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. <br /> <br />Impact AG-C: The project would not result in a cumulatively considerable <br />contribution to a significant agricultural and forestry resources impact. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.