Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0097/PC RESO 1 TWIN DOLPHIN <br />REV: 10-04-23 VR <br />Page 7 of 23 <br /> <br />Section 5. Vesting Tentative Map (TM2023-001): The project requires <br />approval of a Vesting Tentative Map per the Subdivision Ordinance. In the exercise <br />of its independent judgement, the Commission finds that: <br /> <br />a. The map, design, or improvements of the proposed subdivision are <br />consistent with the general or specific plans, the zoning ordinance, <br />or subdivision improvement requirements. <br />The proposed subdivision and associated improvements are consistent <br />with Redwood City’s General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, <br />and all applicable subdivision improvement requirements with approval <br />of a Planned Development as described above (including modifications <br />to standards for reduced parking and interior setbacks). <br /> <br />b. The site is physically suited for the proposed type or density of <br />development. <br />The site is in an urbanized location generally surrounded by office uses <br />and research and development uses, which are both permitted by right <br />in the CP Zoning District. The project is served by existing utilities, would <br />make necessary improvements, and would include green infrastructure <br />to serve the project in conformance with applicable Engineering <br />Standards. <br /> <br />c. The design or proposed improvements are not likely to cause <br />substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably <br />injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat, or cause serious public health <br />problems. <br />The project site is developed with surface parking and office buildings, <br />is generally surrounded by other commercial uses, and does not contain <br />natural features or areas that would be considered habitat for fish or <br />wildlife. <br /> <br />d. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will not <br />conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use <br />of, property within the proposed subdivision, unless acceptable <br />alternate public easements will be provided. <br />The proposed map and associated improvements do not conflict with <br />essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within <br />the proposed project site. Additionally, the project site does not have <br />any public utilities or associated improvements that would be in conflict <br />with the proposed project. Finally, the portions of the existing driveway <br />apron from Lagoon Drive and Twin Dolphin are not used by the public <br />for roadway purposes nor are they necessary to continue regular use of <br />Lagoon Drive and Twin Dolphin, so the proposed vehicular access <br />identified on the map is suitable for the project and it is appropriate to <br />abandon those portions of the property in the existing driveway aprons