Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Focused General Plan Update 11 <br />Final Environmental Impact Report January 2023 <br />construction based on seismic constraints and expected ground-shaking throughout California. Part <br />Two of Title 24 of the SBC includes specific performance standards for safety in regard to soil <br />disturbance and geologic events. During the City’s mandatory development review process, <br />proposed private projects would be evaluated against the seismic design standards of the SBC and <br />General Plan Policies PS‐6.1 and PS-6.3, which address identifying and reducing the risk of <br />geologic and seismic events. Implementation of Public Safety Element policies and the State <br />Building Code would ensure that potential impacts related to seismically induced constraints on <br />future development within the Planning Area would be reduced to less than significant. (Draft EIR, <br />pp. 4.7-15 to 4.7-16) <br />Impact GEO-4: The proposed Project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined in <br />Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect <br />risks to life or property. <br />The Planning Area contains a number of soil types including those characterized as deep <br />clays and silty clays. In areas where soils have a high clay content, the potential exists for expansion <br />when the soil becomes saturated with water. This type of soil constraint could affect structures and <br />their occupants of future development facilitated by Project. However, implementation of General <br />Plan goals and policies and the State Building Code would ensure that potential impacts related to <br />soil constraints, including expansive soils, would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 4.7-16 to <br />4.7-17) <br />Impact GEO-5: The proposed Project would not have soils incapable of adequately <br />supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers <br />are not available for the disposal of wastewater. <br />The entire Planning Area is served by the sewage system infrastructure; there are no septic <br />systems in the Planning Area. The Planning Area is largely urbanized, and the potential housing <br />sites are located where sewage infrastructure is already available. Therefore, potential impacts <br />related to soil constraints of future development facilitated by Project would be less than significant <br />due to the Planning Area being fully serviced by the existing sewage infrastructure. (Draft EIR, p. <br />4.7-17) <br />Impact GEO-6: The proposed Project not directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br />paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature. <br />The Planning Area is not known to have paleontological resources but could potentially <br />have resources that date back hundreds of thousands of years. However, the Planning Area may <br />contain isolated geologic features in some of the steeper, less accessible areas. The City’s Cultural <br />Resources Management Plan requires development proposals to obtain a records search at the <br />Northwest Information Center of the California Archaeological Inventory; interview of persons <br />knowledgeable about the history of the site, as approved by City staff and within a time period <br />designated by staff; and a review of maps archived at the local history room of the Main Library. <br />As a standard condition of approval on all ground disturbing activities in the City’s jurisdiction, the <br />City Community Development and Transportation Department requires work stoppage in the event <br />paleontological resources are identified.