Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Focused General Plan Update 21 <br />Final Environmental Impact Report January 2023 <br />standards to allow an increase in development density/intensity, and General Plan text and map <br />amendments to allow for an increased in development within the City. The Housing Element <br />Update is intended to accommodate the City’s RHNA share determined by ABAG for the 2023- <br />2031 planning period. As such, the population growth associated with the Housing Element Update <br />would not be unplanned. In addition, the population growth would also be consistent with Plan Bay <br />Area 2050, and the Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth. Therefore, <br />this impact would be considered less than significant. (Draft EIR, p. 4.14-7) <br />Impact POP-2: The proposed Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing <br />people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. <br />Although it is possible that new development facilitated by the Project could result in <br />displacement of existing residents, existing housing units that are displaced would be expected to <br />be replaced by higher-density residential development. Therefore, implementation of the Project <br />would result in the net increase of units within the City and would not result in displacement of <br />substantial numbers of population or housing. This impact would be considered less than <br />significant. (Draft EIR, p. 4.14-8) <br />4.15. Public Services <br />Impact PUB-1: The proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts <br />associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for <br />new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response <br />times or other performance objectives for any of the public services. <br />Fire Protection. The General Plan contains goals and policies regarding providing adequate <br />fire protection services, including maintaining sufficient personnel and the highest level of <br />technology and equipment to meet service requirements of new growth and other specific needs. <br />Development facilitated by the Project would be required to pay fees for fire protection services, <br />future development would not have a significant effect on service demands. If additional fire <br />protection facilities and/or resources are needed in the Planning Area, new and/or expanded <br />facilities would need to comply with existing environmental regulations, which would include a <br />development review process and environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Therefore, this impact <br />would be less than significant. <br />Police Protection. The General Plan contains goals and policies regarding providing <br />adequate police protection services, including maintaining sufficient personnel and the highest <br />level of technology and equipment to meet service requirements of new growth and other specific <br />needs. The increased land use intensity in the Planning Area could increase the frequency of <br />emergency and non-emergency calls to the Redwood City Police Department compared to existing <br />conditions. The Project is not anticipated to increase demand for police protection to the extent that <br />new facilities would be required, however, incrementally increased demand on police protection <br />services would be offset by increased property tax revenues which can then be used for the <br />maintenance and/or expansion of police protection facilities. If new or expanded police facilities <br />are required as a result of population growth, the new or expanded facility would need to comply <br />with existing environmental regulations, which would include a development review process and <br />environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.